Citation: | YU Yue, WANG Jin, ZHANG Qiaoyun, CHEN Huiqing, YUAN Fang, LOU Jianlin, ZHAO Rong, LI Jue, JIA Xiaodong, LIU Jing, LI Shuang. Five profiles and influencing factors of burnout-engagement continuum in working populations of China[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2023, 40(4): 389-395, 412. DOI: 10.11836/JEOM22429 |
With the rise and deepening of positive psychology research, theoretical research on job burnout is also deepening worldwide, and some new theoretical models are proposed, such as the burnout-engagement continuum, but there is still a lack of empirical research and application in China.
To analyze the current situation and influencing factors of five profiles in the burnout-engagement continuum in working populations of China: job engagement, ineffective, overextended, disengaged, and burnout.
From August to October 2019 and June to September 2020, a total of 27344 subjects of key occupations in six typical industries, including teachers, firefighters, manufacturing workers, medical staff, flight attendants, and traffic police, were selected from 10 provinces (cities) in the eastern, middle, and western regions of China by multistage stratified cluster sampling method for cross-sectional investigation. Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey and Core Occupational Stress Scale were used to evaluate job burnout and occupational stress respectively. χ2 test was used to compare rates of count data. Binary logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis of the five profiles.
Among the subjects, 24.4%, 61.9%, 31.9%, 12.7%, and 11.8% were the prevalence rates of job engagement, ineffective, overextended, disengaged, and burnout, respectively. Flight attendants (35.7%), firefighters (29.0%), traffic police (28.5%), and manufacturing workers (26.5%) had high prevalence rates of job engagement profile. Medical stuff (62.9%) and manufacturing workers (61.8%) had high prevalence rates of ineffective profile. Teachers (39.2%), traffic police (37.2%), and medical stuff (35.5%) had high prevalence rates of overextended profile. Traffic police (17.9%), medical staff (14.3%), and teachers (13.4%) had high prevalence rates of disengaged profile. Traffic police (16.9%), medical staff (13.4%), and teachers (13.3%) had high prevalence rates of burnout profile. The results of multivariate analysis showed that gender, age, education level, marital status, weekly working hours, length of service, income per month, shift work, smoking, drinking, industry, and occupational stress entered into the regression equations of job engagement, ineffective, overextended, disengaged, and burnout. The risks of overextended (OR=1.456-2.970), disengaged (OR=1.306-4.092), and burnout (OR=1.302-4.102) among the high rating groups of the four factors of occupational stress were higher than those among the low rating groups. Flight attendants (OR=0.296) and firefighters (OR=0.329) had lower risks of burnout than teachers, and flight attendants (OR=0.392) and firefighters (OR=0.466) had lower risks of disengaged than teachers.
Among the prevalence rates of the five profiles in the burnout-engagement continuum in the 6 typical occupational populations in China, ineffective profile is the highest, followed by overextended, and burnout is the lowest. Gender, age, education level, marital status, weekly working hours, length of service, income per month, shift work, smoking, drinking, industry, and occupational stress have different effects on the five profiles, but industry and occupational stress have greater impacts on job burnout.
[1] |
CANU I G, MARCA S C, DELL'ORO F, et al. Harmonized definition of occupational burnout: A systematic review, semantic analysis, and Delphi consensus in 29 countries[J]. Scand J Work Environ Health, 2021, 47(2): 95-107. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3935
|
[2] |
EDÚ-VALSANIA S, LAGUÍA A, MORIANO J A. Burnout: a review of theory and measurement[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(3): 1780. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031780
|
[3] |
MASLACH C, SCHAUFELI W B, LEITER M P. Job burnout[J]. Annu Rev Psychol, 2001, 52: 397-422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
|
[4] |
MASLACH C, JACKSON S E, LEITER M P. The Maslach burnout inventory manual[M]//ZALAQUETT C P, WOOD R J. Evaluating Stress: A Book of Resources. Palo Alto, CA: The Scarecrow Press, 1997.
|
[5] |
MASLACH C, LEITER M P. Early predictors of job burnout and engagement[J]. J Appl Psychol, 2008, 93(3): 498-512. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.498
|
[6] |
LEITER M P, MASLACH C. Latent burnout profiles: a new approach to understanding the burnout experience[J]. Burnout Res, 2016, 3(4): 89-100. doi: 10.1016/j.burn.2016.09.001
|
[7] |
王瑾, 刘晓曼, 孙彦彦, 等. 《职业倦怠通用量表》的多人群信度、效度分析[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2023, 40(4): 382-388.
WANG J, LIU X M, SUN Y Y, et al. Reliability and validity of General Burnout Scale in multiple populations[J]. J Environ Occup Med, 2023, 40(4): 382-388.
|
[8] |
Mind Garden. A message from the Maslach Burnout Inventory Authors [EB/OL]. (2019-03-19) [2022-10-02]. https://www.mindgarden.com/blog/post/44-a-message-from-the-maslach-burnoutinventory-authors.
|
[9] |
王瑾, 张巧耘, 陈惠清, 等. 中国职业人群职业紧张测量核心量表编制[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2020, 54(11): 1184-1189.
WANG J, ZHANG Q Y, CHEN H Q, et al. Development of the Core Occupational Stress Scale for occupational populations in China[J]. Chin J Prev Med, 2020, 54(11): 1184-1189.
|
[10] |
SCHAUFELI W B, TARIS T W, VAN RHENEN W. Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being?[J]. Appl Psychol, 2008, 57(2): 173-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00285.x
|
[11] |
GALANAKIS M D, TSITOURI E. Positive psychology in the working environment. Job demands-resources theory, work engagement and burnout: A systematic literature review[J]. Front Psychol, 2022, 13: 1022102. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1022102
|
[12] |
BAKKER A B, SHIMAZU A, LEITER M P, et al. Work engagement: an emerging concept in occupational health psychology[J]. Biosci Trends, 2008, 2(1): 2.
|
[13] |
DE HERT S. Burnout in healthcare workers: prevalence, impact and preventative strategies[J]. Local Reg Anesth, 2020, 13: 171-183. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S240564
|
[14] |
AL-ASADI J, KHALAF S, AL-WAALY A, et al. Burnout among primary school teachers in Iraq: prevalence and risk factors[J]. East Mediterr Health J, 2018, 24(3): 262-268. doi: 10.26719/2018.24.3.262
|
[15] |
BATISTA J B V, CARLOTTO M S, COUTINHO A S, et al. Prevalence of burnout syndrome and sociodemographic and work factors of elementary education teachers of the city of João Pessoa[J]. Rev Bras Epidemiol, 2010, 13(3): 502-512. doi: 10.1590/S1415-790X2010000300013
|
[16] |
DE LA FUENTE SOLANA E I, EXTREMERA R A, PECINO C V, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of burnout syndrome among Spanish police officers[J]. Psicothema, 2013, 25(4): 488-493.
|
[17] |
ROELEN C A M, VAN HOFFEN M F A, GROOTHOFF J W, et al. Can the Maslach Burnout Inventory and Utrecht Work Engagement Scale be used to screen for risk of long-term sickness absence?[J]. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 2015, 88(4): 467-475. doi: 10.1007/s00420-014-0981-2
|
[1] | WANG Chao, LI Jue, FU Hua. Advances on economic burden of occupational stress[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2018, 35(7): 665-670. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2018.17711 |
[2] | HOU Rui-li, NIU Wenliang, WEI Li-qin, ZHAO Ruo-wang, JIA Yu-qiao, WEI Xia-fei. Occupational stress and influencing factors of physicians in Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2017, 34(12): 1076-1081. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2017.17432 |
[3] | TAO Ning, AN Hengqing, ZHANG Jian-jiang, XIE Na, LIU Ji-wen. Effect of Occupational Stress on Sleep Quality of Oil Workers in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2016, 33(12): 1143-1147. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2016.16362 |
[4] | ZHAI Min, GUO Li-yan, WU Da-ji, HAN Ying-jie, WEI Ling-xia, QIAO Yan-yan, LIU Jian-ming, MAO Shu-qi. Is Occupational Stress Associated with Embryonic Arrest?[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2016, 33(2): 143-146. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2016.15378 |
[5] | ZHANGZheng-bao , WANG Li-jun , PENG Peng . Association of Occupational Stress with Serum Dopamine and Norepinephrine in Nurses[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2015, 32(4): 328-331. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2015.14320 |
[6] | XIAO Tai-qin . Occupational Stress Status among Offshore Oil Workers[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2013, 30(10): 780-782. |
[7] | JIN Yu-lan , CHEN Tong , YAO San-qiao , SHEN Fu-hai , WANG Qian , JIANG Shou-fang , BAI Yu-ping . Impact of Occupational Stress on Job Satisfaction among Surgeons in a City[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2013, 30(9): 680-682,685. |
[8] | YU Shan-fa . Data Processing and Statistical Methods in Occupational Stress Research[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2013, 30(7): 494-497. |
[9] | YAN Shi-yong , HE Yong-pin , LAI Shao-rong , DING Xiao-cang , YANG Pei-di , DAI Jun-ming , CHENG Si-lu , FU Hua . Association between Occupational Stress and Job Burnout among Staff in Companies[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2011, 28(8): 466-470. |
[10] | ZHOU Hui , ZHENG Neng-xiong , SHEN Bo , LIU Bao-ying , CHEN Zhu-yun . Relationship between Blood Lipid and Occupational Stress and Its Influencing Factors[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2010, 27(8): 491-494. |
1. |
刘庆伟,盖玉彪,郭小靖,张宇辰,赵玉晓. ICU护士恢复体验在工余塑造与工作投入间的中介效应分析. 中华急危重症护理杂志. 2024(09): 793-798 .
![]() | |
2. |
朱泉熔,王俊人,贾金忠,刘梦荃,严琪,朱睿,温明月,林皇涛,王志锋. 临床医学硕士专业学位研究生导师“职业倦怠-工作投入连续体”现状. 中华医学教育探索杂志. 2024(09): 1169-1175 .
![]() | |
3. |
胡筱萌,钟志艳. 医学期刊编辑职业倦怠成因与对策分析. 黄冈师范学院学报. 2024(06): 103-107 .
![]() | |
4. |
孙占颖,田楚娇,陈静茹,甘雪洋,宋杰,苏清清,高远. 气虚质在远洋航行舰员复原力与疲劳间的中介效应分析. 职业卫生与应急救援. 2024(06): 699-704 .
![]() | |
5. |
重竺君,陈雪芮,王雨婷,杨凯茜,何宗岭,邱培媛,欧阳艾莅. 简易应对方式问卷在四川省阿坝藏族羌族自治州消防员群体中的信效度检验及修订. 现代预防医学. 2024(23): 4238-4243 .
![]() | |
6. |
余善法. 充分认识职业倦怠的危害,积极推动科学研究和预防控制工作. 环境与职业医学. 2023(04): 369-373 .
![]() | |
7. |
刘洋毅. 战时勤务状态下西南某市交通警察职业倦怠水平调查与应对. 四川警察学院学报. 2023(03): 46-55 .
![]() | |
8. |
徐娜,吴玉群,姚艳,何凤平,黄咏诗. 佛山市某铝业工人职业紧张与职业倦怠现况分析. 国际医药卫生导报. 2023(20): 2981-2985 .
![]() |