WANG Jia, WANG Huizhong, JIANG Juan, LAI Wei, TAO Haiping, FENG Zhengzhi. Revision of the Physical Courage at Work Scale[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2022, 39(1): 36-40. DOI: 10.11836/JEOM21244
Citation: WANG Jia, WANG Huizhong, JIANG Juan, LAI Wei, TAO Haiping, FENG Zhengzhi. Revision of the Physical Courage at Work Scale[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2022, 39(1): 36-40. DOI: 10.11836/JEOM21244

Revision of the Physical Courage at Work Scale

Funds: This study was funded.
More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    FENG Zhengzhi,Email:fzz@tmmu.edu.cn

  • Received Date: May 29, 2021
  • Accepted Date: December 06, 2021
  • Published Date: January 24, 2022
  • [Background] According to China's Labor Statistics Yearbook 2020, there were 113293 work-related injuries and 25092 work-related deaths in 2019. It is of great significance to enhance the courage quality of high-risk workers for the maintenance of personal health and the effectiveness of organizational work.

    [Objective] To revise the Physical Courage at Work Scale (PCWS) for its application in Chinese employees exposed to high-risk workplace.

    [Methods] A total of 1280 high-risk workers completed the revised PCWS for Chinese employees. Item analysis and exploratory factor analysis were used to analyze the scale's construction validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to verify the results of exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach's α coefficient was used to verify the reliability of the scale, Pearson correlation analysis of the scale with Mental Quality Questionnaire for Armymen (MQQA) and Norton Courage Measure (CM) was used to verify the validity of the revised PCWS, and Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the discrimination for each factor of the revised PCWS.

    [Results] The results of item analysis showed that the correlation coefficients between the scores of all items and the total score of the revised PCWS were greater than 0.4. The exploratory analysis indicated that there were five factors including immediate danger,providing for family, confronting other's aggression, reporting violations, and contributing to society in the revised version. The confirmatory analysis indicated the five-factor model fitted well (minimum fit function Chi-square/degree of freedom, CMIN/DF=4.60; normed fit index, NFI=0.93; comparative fit index, CFI=0.95; incremental fit index, IFI=0.93; standardized root mean square residual, SRMR=0.05; root mean square error of approximation, RMSEA=0.07). The internal consistency coefficient of the revised PCWS was α=0.95. The correlation coefficients of the revised PCWS with MQQA and CM ranged from 0.11 to 0.28 (P<0.01), and the correlation coefficients between factors of the revised scale ranged from 0.35 to 0.72 (P<0.01).

    [Conclusion] The revised PCWS has good reliability and validity in Chinese employees.

  • [1]

    SIORDIA C, GALLEY F. Participation of workers of Asian ancestry in high-risk occupations in the United States: 2009 to 2017[J]. J Immigr Minor Health, 2020, 22(5): 1010-1016.

    doi: 10.1007/s10903-020-01006-5
    [2]

    ROBERTS S E, JAREMIN B, LLOYD K. High-risk occupations for suicide[J]. Psychol Med, 2013, 43(6): 1231-1240.

    doi: 10.1017/S0033291712002024
    [3]

    POLSHKOVA S, CHABAN O, WALTON M A. Alcohol use, depression, and high-risk occupations among young adults in the Ukraine[J]. Subst Use Misuse, 2016, 51(7): 948-951.

    doi: 10.3109/10826084.2016.1156700
    [4]

    VINOKUR A D, PIERCE P F, LEWANDOWSKI-ROMPS L, et al. Effects of war exposure on air force personnel's mental health, job burnout and other organizational related outcomes[J]. J Occup Health Psychol, 2011, 16(1): 3-17.

    doi: 10.1037/a0021617
    [5]

    JONKER B E, GRAUPNER L I, ROSSOUW L. An intervention framework to facilitate psychological trauma management in high-risk occupations[J]. Front Psychol, 2020, 11: 530.

    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00530
    [6]

    程翠萍, 黄希庭. 勇气: 理论、测量及影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(7): 1170-1177.

    doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01170

    CHENG C P, HUANG X T. Courage: theories, measurements, and correlate factors[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2014, 22(7): 1170-1177.

    doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01170
    [7]

    HOWARD M C, REILEY P J. Physical courage predicts relevant outcomes in associated contexts: The creation of a measure and empirical analysis into the construct[J]. J Bus Res, 2020, 110: 80-94.

    doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.015
    [8]

    NORTON P J, WEISS B J. The role of courage on behavioral approach in a fear-eliciting situation: a proof-of-concept pilot study[J]. J Anxiety Disord, 2009, 23(2): 212-217.

    doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.07.002
    [9]

    廖雅琴. 军人心理素质结构及其特点的研究[D]. 重庆: 第三军医大学, 2006.

    LIAO Y Q. A study on the mental quality structure and its developmental characteristics in Armymen[D]. Chongqing: Army Medical University, 2006.

    [10]

    RATE C R, CLARKE J A, LINDSAY D R, et al. Implicit theories of courage[J]. J Posit Psychol, 2007, 2(2): 80-98.

    doi: 10.1080/17439760701228755
    [11]

    国家统计局人口和就业统计司, 人力资源和社会保障部规划财务司. 中国劳动统计年鉴-2020[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020: 400-403.

    Department of Population and Employment Statistics National Bureau of Statistics Department of Planning and Finance, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security. China labour statistical yearbook 2020[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2020: 400-403. .

    [12]

    张立安, 王慧飞, 欧珏, 等. 消防员职业安全健康风险及保障措施研究现状与建议[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2021, 38(2): 163-168.

    ZHANG L A, WANG H F, OU Y, et al. Research status and suggestions on occupational safety and health risks and safeguard measures of firefighters[J]. J Environ Occup Med, 2021, 38(2): 163-168.

    [13]

    吴明隆. 结构方程模型–AMOS的操作与应用[M]. 2版. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010: 39-48.

    WU M L. Structural equation model—operation and application of AMOS[M]. 2 nd ed. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2010: 39-48.

Catalog

    Article views (2906) PDF downloads (579) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return