冀芳, 张建, 丁晓文, 崔向兰, 荣利, 王学峰, 李珏. 某大型机械维修企业职业性噪声暴露工人听力损失特征及相关因素分析[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2024, 41(1): 77-82. DOI: 10.11836/JEOM23206
引用本文: 冀芳, 张建, 丁晓文, 崔向兰, 荣利, 王学峰, 李珏. 某大型机械维修企业职业性噪声暴露工人听力损失特征及相关因素分析[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2024, 41(1): 77-82. DOI: 10.11836/JEOM23206
JI Fang, ZHANG Jian, DING Xiaowen, CUI Xianglan, RONG Li, WANG Xuefeng, LI Jue. Characteristics and influencing factors of hearing loss among noise-exposed workers in a large machinery maintenance enterprise[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2024, 41(1): 77-82. DOI: 10.11836/JEOM23206
Citation: JI Fang, ZHANG Jian, DING Xiaowen, CUI Xianglan, RONG Li, WANG Xuefeng, LI Jue. Characteristics and influencing factors of hearing loss among noise-exposed workers in a large machinery maintenance enterprise[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2024, 41(1): 77-82. DOI: 10.11836/JEOM23206

某大型机械维修企业职业性噪声暴露工人听力损失特征及相关因素分析

Characteristics and influencing factors of hearing loss among noise-exposed workers in a large machinery maintenance enterprise

  • 摘要: 背景

    我国职业性噪声聋发病的上升趋势,说明职业人群的听力损失未得到有效控制,开展相关研究具有重要的现实意义。

    目的

    通过对大型机械维修企业噪声暴露工人听力损失的现状调查,综合分析其听力损失特征和影响因素,为噪声性听力损失的预防干预提供科学参考。

    方法

    对某大型机械维修企业的男性汉族职业性噪声暴露工人开展横断面调查,通过问卷调查获得研究对象的人口学特征、职业暴露史和个体生活行为特征等资料,通过历年职业病危害因素检测报告获得职业性有害因素暴露水平资料,通过职业健康检查获得纯音听阈检查数据,采用累积噪声暴露量(CNE)评估个体噪声接触水平。根据纯音气导听阈测试结果将研究对象分为听力损失组和听力正常组,采用卡方检验进行两组间职业暴露特征及个体生活行为特征的比较,采用趋势卡方检验分析两组年龄、工龄、CNE与听力损失率的变化趋势。采用多因素logistic回归模型分析双耳高频听力损失与其相关影响因素之间的关系。

    结果

    2531名职业性噪声暴露工人CNE的MP25P75)为97.51(95.39,99.96)dB(A)·年,接噪工人的听力异常发生率、双耳及任意耳高频听力损失发生率、双耳及任意耳语频听力异常发生率分别为22.48%、16.59%、22.13%、2.77%、3.52%,听力异常以高频听阈升高为主(占听力异常的98.42%)。与CNE≤97 dB(A)·年组相比,97 dB(A)·年<CNE≤100 dB(A)·年组和CNE > 100 dB(A)·年组发生双耳高频听力损失的风险分别增加了36.4%和52.3%。与不吸烟组相比,吸烟组发生双耳高频听力损失的风险增加了43.5%。与偶尔佩戴防护用品组相比,经常佩戴防护用品组发生双耳高频听力损失的风险下降了23.6%。可见CNE>97 dB(A)·年和吸烟可能是双耳高频听力损失的独立危险因素,经常佩戴听力防护用品是重要的保护因素。

    结论

    CNE增加及吸烟可增加高频听力损失风险,而做好个人听力保护可有效降低听力损失风险。

     

    Abstract: Background

    The current increasing trend of new cases of occupational noise-induced deafness indicates that the hearing loss of occupational population has not been effectively controlled in China. It is of great significance to study the characteristics of hearing loss among noise-exposed workers and its related factors.

    Objective

    To investigate characteristics and influencing factors of hearing loss among occupational noise-exposed workers in a large machinery maintenance enterprise, and to provide a scientific basis to prevent and control noise-induced hearing loss.

    Methods

    A cross-sectional survey was conducted to investigate male Han occupational noise-exposed workers in a large mechanical maintenance enterprise. We acquired demographic characteristics, occupational exposure history, and individual life behavior characteristics of the workers through questionnaires, collected occupational exposure level data from annual occupational disease hazard factor surveillance reports, obtained pure tone hearing threshold test data through occupational health examinations, and estimated individual noise exposure levels using cumulative noise exposure (CNE). According to the results of pure tone air conduction hearing threshold test, the workers were divided into a hearing loss group and a normal hearing group. The chi-square test was employed to compare the occupational exposure characteristics and individual life behavior characteristics between the two groups. Additionally, the trend chi-square test was utilized to analyze the changing trends of age, length of service, CNE, and hearing loss rate within the two groups. The relationship between high-frequency hearing loss in both ears and its related influencing factors was assessed by a multiple logistic regression model.

    Results

    The M (P25, P75) of CNE for the 2531 occupational noise-exposed workers was 97.51 (95.39, 99.96) dB(A)·year. The incidence of hearing anomaly, binaural high-frequency hearing anomaly, random ear high-frequency hearing anomaly, binaural low-frequency hearing anomaly, and random ear low-frequency hearing anomaly were 22.48%, 16.59%, 22.13%, 2.77%, and 3.52%, respectively. High-frequency hearing threshold increase was the main reason for hearing anomaly (98.42%). In comparison to the CNE ≤ 97 dB(A)·year group, the 97 dB(A)·year<CNE≤ 100 dB(A)·year group and the CNE>100 dB(A)·year group experienced a 36.4% and 52.3% increase in the risk of bilateral high-frequency hearing loss, respectively. The smoking group exhibited a 43.5% elevated risk of bilateral high-frequency hearing loss when compared to the non-smoking group. Conversely, the group frequently wearing hearing protection equipment demonstrated a 23.6% lower risk of bilateral high-frequency hearing loss in comparison to the group occasionally wearing protective equipment. The data suggested that CNE>97 dB(A)·year and smoking might be independent risk factors for bilateral high-frequency hearing loss, and frequently wearing hearing protection equipment might be an important protective factor.

    Conclusion

    Increased CNE and smoking can elevate the risk of high-frequency hearing loss, while personal hearing protection can effectively reduce the risk of hearing loss.

     

/

返回文章
返回