阎聪侠, 李宝平, 沈福海, 曹宏, 李静, 张丽荣, 孙治平, 侯博文, 高丽妮, 李欣宇, 马超逸, 刘晓璐. 心肺运动试验指导综合性肺康复在尘肺病患者中的应用效果评价[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2024, 41(1): 47-53. DOI: 10.11836/JEOM23140
引用本文: 阎聪侠, 李宝平, 沈福海, 曹宏, 李静, 张丽荣, 孙治平, 侯博文, 高丽妮, 李欣宇, 马超逸, 刘晓璐. 心肺运动试验指导综合性肺康复在尘肺病患者中的应用效果评价[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2024, 41(1): 47-53. DOI: 10.11836/JEOM23140
YAN Congxia, LI Baoping, SHEN Fuhai, CAO Hong, LI Jing, ZHANG Lirong, SUN Zhiping, HOU Bowen, GAO Lini, LI Xinyu, MA Chaoyi, LIU Xiaolu. Application evaluation of cardiopulmonary exercise test to guide comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with pneumoconiosis[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2024, 41(1): 47-53. DOI: 10.11836/JEOM23140
Citation: YAN Congxia, LI Baoping, SHEN Fuhai, CAO Hong, LI Jing, ZHANG Lirong, SUN Zhiping, HOU Bowen, GAO Lini, LI Xinyu, MA Chaoyi, LIU Xiaolu. Application evaluation of cardiopulmonary exercise test to guide comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with pneumoconiosis[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2024, 41(1): 47-53. DOI: 10.11836/JEOM23140

心肺运动试验指导综合性肺康复在尘肺病患者中的应用效果评价

Application evaluation of cardiopulmonary exercise test to guide comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with pneumoconiosis

  • 摘要: 背景

    目前我国尘肺病肺康复实践处于初级阶段,个体化综合性肺康复方案制定依据尚不足,是基层康复工作开展的限制因素之一。

    目的

    以心肺运动试验(CPET)测得的最大心率为依据制定运动处方,对稳定期尘肺病患者进行个体化综合性肺康复,评价其在改善尘肺病患者的运动耐力及生活质量中的作用,为肺康复的应用与推广提供依据。

    方法

    选取2022年4—8月晋能控股煤业集团有限公司职业病防治院收治的68例尘肺病患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为干预组及对照组,每组34例,均于分组前参加基线测试。入组后对照组给予常规药物治疗,干预组在常规药物治疗的基础上,行多学科综合性肺康复,内容包括健康教育、呼吸训练、运动训练、营养指导、心理干预和睡眠管理,运动强度依据患者CPET测试的最大心率确定,康复训练疗程为24 周。分别在入组时和研究结束时对患者进行康复评估,采用CPET测定患者的每千克体重峰值摄氧量(pVO2/kg)、无氧阈(AT)、二氧化碳通气当量(EqCO2)、最大代谢当量(METs)和峰值负荷(Wmax),通过改良版英国医学研究委员会呼吸困难问卷(mMRC)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、匹茨堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估量表(CAT)及健康调查简表(SF-36)收集两组患者相关信息并予以评分,对以上资料进行比较分析,评估两组综合性肺康复的治疗效果。

    结果

    本研究共纳入68例尘肺病患者,其中63例资料完整,对照组31例,干预组32例。试验前,两组患者的基本情况及pVO2/kg、AT、EqCO2、METs和Wmax对比,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验结束时,干预组尘肺病患者的pVO2/kg为(19.81±2.38)mL·(min·kg)−1,AT为(14.48±2.33)mL·(min·kg)−1,METs为(5.64±0.69),Wmax为(85.25±14.52)W,均高于对照组相应值(13.90±2.37)mL·(min·kg)−1、(11.70±1.94)mL·(min·kg)−1、(3.97±0.70)、(61.77±14.72)W,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001);两组EqCO2相比,差异无统计学意义(P=0.083)。试验前,两组患者mMRC、SAS、SDS、PSQI和CAT得分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);试验结束时,干预组尘肺病患者的mMRC得分(1.16±0.57)、SAS得分(27.93±2.12)、SDS得分(26.48±1.44)、PSQI得分(1.08±0.88)、CAT得分(4.34±3.28)均低于对照组的得分(2.03±0.83)、(35.87±6.91)、(34.23±6.65)、(5.37±3.03)、(13.87±7.53),差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。在具可比性的SF-36问卷的7个维度中,试验后干预组5个维度得分躯体疼痛(94.13±10.72)、一般健康状况(87.50±5.68)、精力(95.31±5.53)、精神健康(99.88±0.71)、健康变化(74.22±4.42)均高于对照组的相应得分(71.87±32.72)、(65.81±15.55)、(74.52±16.45)、(86.97±16.56)和(29.84±13.50)(P<0.001);而社会功能和情感职能两维度得分无差异(P>0.05)。

    结论

    综合性肺康复治疗可以提高尘肺病患者的摄氧能力和运动耐力,改善呼吸困难症状、心理状态和睡眠质量,提高生活质量。

     

    Abstract: Background

    At present, the practice of pulmonary rehabilitation for pneumoconiosis in China is in a primary stage. The basis for formulating an individualized comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation plan is still insufficient, which is one of the factors limiting the development of community-level rehabilitation work.

    Objective

    To formulate an exercise prescription based on maximum heart rate measured by cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), conduct an individualized comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation program with the exercise prescription for patients with stable pneumoconiosis, and evaluate its role in improving exercise endurance and quality of life, thus provide a basis for the application and promotion of pulmonary rehabilitation.

    Methods

    A total of 68 patients were recruited from the Occupational Disease Prevention Hospital of Jinneng Holding Coal Industry Group Co., Ltd. from April to August 2022 , and were divided into an intervention group and a control group by random number table method, with 34 cases in each group. All the pneumoconiosis patients participated in a baseline test. The control group was given routine drug treatment, while the intervention group received multidisciplinary comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation treatment on the basis of routine drug treatment, including health education, breathing training, exercise training, nutrition guidance, psychological intervention, and sleep management, whose exercise intensity was determined according to the maximum heart rate provided by CPET. The rehabilitation training lasted for 24 weeks. Patients were evaluated at registration and the end of study respectively. CPET was used to measure peak oxygen uptake per kilogram (pVO2/kg), anaerobic threshold (AT), carbon dioxide equivalent of ventilation (EqCO2), maximum metabolic equivalent (METs), and maximum work (Wmax). The modified British Medical Research Council Dyspnea Questionnaire (mMRC), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT), and Short Form of Health Survey (SF-36) were used to evaluate the potential effect of the comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation program.

    Results

    Among the included 68 patients, 63 patients were having complete data, then 31 cases were assigned in the control group and 32 cases in the interventional group. Before the intervention, there was no significant difference in pVO2/kg, AT, EqCO2, METs, or Wmax between the two groups (P>0.05). At the end of the trail, the indicators like pVO2/kg (19.81±2.38) mL·(min·kg)−1, AT (14.48±2.33) mL·(min·kg)−1, METs (5.64±0.69), and Wmax (85.25±14) W of patients in the intervention group were all higher than those (13.90±2.37) mL·(min·kg)−1, (11.70±1.94) mL·(min kg)−1, (3.97±0.70), and (61.77±14.72) W, respectively in the control group (P<0.001); there was no significant difference in EqCO2 between the two groups (P=0.083). Before the trial, there was no significant difference in mMRC, SAS, SDS, PSQI, or CAT scores between the two groups (P>0.05). At the end of the trail, the mMRC score (1.16±0.57), SAS score (27.93±2.12), SDS score (26.48±1.44), PSQI score (1.08±0.88), and CAT score (4.34±3.28) of patients in the intervention group were lower than those (2.03±0.83), (35.87±6.91), (34.23±6.65), (5.37±3.03), and (13.87±7.53), respectively in the control group (P<0.001). The SF-36 scores of bodily pain (94.13±10.72), general health (87.50±5.68), vitality (95.31±5.53), mental health (99.88±0.71), and health changes (74.22±4.42) in the intervention group were higher than those (71.87±32.72), (65.81±15.55), (74.52±16.45), (86.97±16.56), and (29.84±13.50), respectively in the control group (P<0.001), and no significant difference was found in social functioning and role emotional scores (P>0.05).

    Conclusion

    Comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation can increase the oxygen intake and exercise endurance of pneumoconiosis patients, ameliorate dyspnea symptoms, elevate psychological state and sleep quality, and improve the quality of life.

     

/

返回文章
返回