人体不同生理功能状态对抗渡海运动病能力的影响及对策研究

张瑞萍, 张波, 赵金良

张瑞萍, 张波, 赵金良. 人体不同生理功能状态对抗渡海运动病能力的影响及对策研究[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2010, 27(8): 456-459.
引用本文: 张瑞萍, 张波, 赵金良. 人体不同生理功能状态对抗渡海运动病能力的影响及对策研究[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2010, 27(8): 456-459.
ZHANG Rui-ping , ZHANG Bo , ZHAO Jin-liang . Effects of Different Physiological Function Status on the Anti-seasickness Ability and Its Countermeasures[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2010, 27(8): 456-459.
Citation: ZHANG Rui-ping , ZHANG Bo , ZHAO Jin-liang . Effects of Different Physiological Function Status on the Anti-seasickness Ability and Its Countermeasures[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2010, 27(8): 456-459.

人体不同生理功能状态对抗渡海运动病能力的影响及对策研究

基金项目: 烟台大学青年科学基金课题(编号:TY07Z13)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    张瑞萍(1976-),女,硕士,讲师;研究方向:运动人体科学,E-mail:zrp076@163.com

    通讯作者:

    张波,Email:zb197555@163.com

Effects of Different Physiological Function Status on the Anti-seasickness Ability and Its Countermeasures

More Information
    Corresponding author:

    ZHANG Bo ,Email:zb197555@163.com

  • 摘要:
    [目的] 分析人体不同的生理功能状态对抗渡海运动病能力的影响,探讨低下生理状态时渡海运动病发病机制,并提出相关对策。

    [方法] 将54名受试者随机分为3组,分别为剥夺睡眠28 h后(睡眠剥夺组)、5 km武装越野后(运动性疲劳组)和正常安静状态下(对照组)进行渡海运动病诱发模拟实验。

    [结果] 对照组、睡眠剥夺组和运动性疲劳组渡海运动病总发生率分别为88.9%、100.0%、100.0%(P>0.05)。其中,睡眠剥夺组和运动性疲劳组轻度渡海运动病的发生率分别为33.3%和27.8%,均明显低于对照组(55.6%)(P<0.05);而重度渡海运动病发生率分别为38.9%和33.3%,均明显高于对照组(11.1%)(P<0.05)。同时,该二组(睡眠剥夺组和运动性疲劳组)模拟渡海运动病实验后红细胞乙酰胆碱酯酶(RBC-AchE)分别为(21.76& #177;4.85)、(23.71& #177;2.42) kU/L,明显低于对照组(25.29& #177;2.70) kU/L (P<0.01);但血浆中血管紧张素Ⅱ(P-AngⅡ)并无明显变化。

    [结论] 睡眠剥夺和运动性疲劳可明显削弱机体抗渡海运动病能力,受训人员进行抗眩晕适应性训练时应保持充足睡眠,掌握多种有利于消除疲劳的方法和手段。

     

    Abstract:
    [Objective] To study the effects of different physiological function status on anti-seasickness ability, in order to provide the theoretical basis for the adaptability training.

    [Methods] Fifty-four male subjects were divided into 3 groups randomly. The one named sleep-deprivation group who resisted the dizzy simulation experiment after depriving their sleep for 28 hours, the other one named exercise-induced fatigue group who also resisted the same experiment after 5 kilometers armed crosscountry training and the third named control group did the experiment in their normal quiet condition.

    [Results] The incidence of seasickness was 88.9% in the control group, but 100.0% in the sleep-deprivation group and in the exercise-induced fatigue group. The incidence of mild seasickness was 33.3% in the sleep deprivation group and 27.8% in the exercise-induced fatigue one, significantly lower than that in the control group (55.6%) (P<0.05). The incidence of severe motion sickness was 38.9% in the sleep-deprivation group and 33.3% in the exercise-induced fatigue one, significantly higher than the control group (11.1%) (P<0.05). After resisting the dizzy simulation experiment, the RBC-AChE was (21.76& #177;4.85)kU/L in the sleep-deprivation group and (23.71& #177;2.42)kU/L in the exercise-induced fatigue one, significantly lower than that in the control group(, 25.29& #177;2.70)kU/L (P<0.05). The content of Ang Ⅱ in all the test groups had no statistical significant difference with control group.

    [Conclusion] The sleep deprivation and sport induced fatigue can weaken the ability of anti-seasickness. The personnel in training for antiseasickness should have enough sleep and master a variety of ways and means to eliminate fatigue.

     

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1843
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
  • PDF下载量:  452
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2009-09-21
  • 刊出日期:  2017-06-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回