膳食质量与乳头状甲状腺癌关系的病例对照研究

Case-control study on relationship between diet quality and papillary thyroid carcinoma

  • 摘要:
    背景  目前关于甲状腺癌患者的膳食质量研究较少,膳食质量与甲状腺癌的关联尚不明确。
    目的  应用中国健康膳食指数(CHDI)评估膳食质量,分析其与乳头状甲状腺癌(PTC)之间的关系。
    方法  选取上海市肿瘤医院和仁济医院(东院)确诊的PTC新发病例为病例组,按性别、年龄1∶1匹配无甲状腺癌的健康人为对照组。采用统一设计的调查表收集研究对象的人口学信息、疾病史、膳食行为和生活方式等资料;采用经验证的食物频率法,调查研究对象过去一年的膳食情况。根据中国居民膳食指南选择 CHDI 构成指标,参照中国人群各类食物和营养素的推荐摄入量标准,确定每个构成指标的取值方法,运用CHDI评价两组人群的膳食质量,并利用多因素条件logistic回归模型分析膳食质量与PTC的关系。
    结果  350对PTC病例对照纳入研究,病例组CHDI得分中位数低于对照组(67.8 vs. 73.4,P<0.001)。在CHDI的各评分项中,病例组水果类、奶类、大豆类得分中位数低于对照组(分别为6.8vs. 9.5、3.6 vs. 5.6、4.6 vs. 5.5,P<0.05);病例组精制谷物得分中位数高于对照组(5.0vs.4.9),且得分达满分(即推荐摄入量)的比例高于对照组(65.4% vs. 48.6%,P < 0.05);病例组全谷物和杂豆薯类、蔬菜总量、深色蔬菜、鱼虾类得分中位数低于对照组(分别为0.9 vs. 1.4、3.1 vs. 4.4、3.6 vs. 5.0、3.3 vs. 4.0),且得分达到满分(即推荐摄入量)的比例均低于对照组(分别为6.3% vs. 8.6%、32.6% vs. 42.0%、38.6% vs. 50.6%、34.0% vs.40.3%,P<0.05)。多因素条件logistic回归分析后发现,与膳食质量不合格者比较,膳食质量合格和良好者PTC发病风险较低(合格者,OR=0.37,95%CI:0.23~0.62;良好者,OR=0.19,95%CI:0.10~0.36);去除有良性疾病史的患者后,结果仍然保持一致(合格者,OR=0.28,95%CI:0.15~0.52;良好者,OR=0.20,95%CI:0.09~0.43)。
    结论  膳食质量合格和良好者PTC的发病风险低。病例组在水果类、奶豆类、全谷物和杂豆薯类、蔬菜类、鱼虾类等方面摄入不足。

     

    Abstract:
    Background  There are few studies on the diet quality of patients with thyroid cancer, and the relationship between diet quality and thyroid cancer remains uncertain.
    Objective  This study aims to assess the diet quality with the Chinese Health Diet Index (CHDI) and to explore the relationship between diet quality and papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).
    Methods  A 1∶1 gender- and age-matched hospital-based case-control study included newly diagnosed PTC patients and matched controls from Shanghai Cancer Hospital and Renji Hospital (East) in Shanghai, China. A structured questionnaire was applied to collect data on general characteristics, history of diseases, dietary intakes, and lifestyles. Food intakes in the past one year were assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire, from which the CHDI score was calculated. The CHDI, according to the Dietary Guidelines for Chinese Residents, was employed to evaluate the diet quality of the two groups. A multiple conditional logistic regression model was conducted to explore the relationship between diet quality and PTC.
    Results  A total of 350 pairs of cases and controls were recruited. The overall median CHDI score of the cases was lower than that of the controls (67.8 vs. 73.4, P<0.001). The cases had lower median scores of fruits (6.8vs. 9.5), dairy products (3.6 vs. 5.6), and soybeans (4.6 vs. 5.5) than the controls (P<0.05); the cases had a higher median score of refined grains than the controls (5.0 vs. 4.9), and the percentage of the cases that met diet recommendations for refined grains was higher than the percentage of the controls (65.4% vs. 48.6%) (P<0.05); the cases showed lower median scores of whole grains/beans/tubers, total vegetables, dark vegetables, and fish/shrimps (0.9vs. 1.4, 3.1 vs. 4.4, 3.6 vs. 5.0, and 3.3 vs. 4.0, respectively), and the percentages of the cases meeting their diet recommendations were lower than the percentages of the controls (6.3% vs. 8.6%, 32.6% vs. 42.0%, 38.6% vs. 50.6%, and 34.0% vs.40.3%, respectively, P<0.05). The results of multiple conditional logistic regression analysis suggested that qualified and good diet quality were associated with a reduced the risk of PTC (qualified diet quality, OR=0.37, 95%CI: 0.23−0.62; good diet quality, OR=0.19, 95%CI: 0.10−0.36); the statistical significance remained after excluding patients who had a history of benign thyroid conditions (qualified diet quality,OR=0.28, 95%CI: 0.15−0.52; good diet quality, OR=0.20, 95%CI: 0.09−0.43).
    Conclusion  Those with qualified or good diet quality have a lower risk of PTC. PTC patients have insufficient intakes of fruits, dairy, soybeans, whole grains/beans/tubers, vegetables, and fish/shrimps.

     

/

返回文章
返回