上海市大型展会部分室内空气污染物分布特征与健康风险评价

Distribution characteristics of indoor air pollutants in large-scale exhibitions in Shanghai and its health risk assessment

  • 摘要:
    背景 展会室内污染主要来源于布展材料和部分展品,尤其大型展会布展材料种类多,数量大,无法预留挥发时间,加上大量参展人群聚集在一起,大型展会的室内空气污染可能带来健康风险。
    目的 了解大型展会室内空气污染状况及从业人员健康风险,为控制大型展会室内空气质量并制定有效管控措施提供科学依据。
    方法 分别于2019年、2020年的7-9月对上海某大型会展中心9个展馆室内空气污染物中甲醛、苯、甲苯、二甲苯、氨和总挥发性有机物(TVOC)进行监测,并依据GB 37488-2019《公共场所卫生指标及限值要求》进行评价,运用美国环境保护局健康风险评估模型开展从业人员健康风险评估。同时,对不同的通风状态和展品的监测结果进行分析比较。
    结果 本次监测的上海某大型会展中心室内空气总合格率为96.3%(182/189),合格率较低指标主要有甲醛(98.4%)、氨(99.5%)、TVOC(98.4%)。"全新风+开启馆门"的通风方式下甲醛、氨、苯和TVOC质量浓度(后称:浓度)的MP25P75)分别为0.041(0.033,0.047)、0.028(ND,0.039)、0.006(ND,0.020)、0.100(0.062,0.190)mg·m-3,"新风+回风+馆门关门"的通风方式下4者浓度分别为0.050(0.038,0.063)、0.040(0.035,0.070)、0.019(ND,0.028)、0.155(0.095,0.253)mg·m-3,"全新风+开启馆门"的通风方式下上述污染物浓度水平均低于"新风+回风+馆门关门"的通风方式。甲苯、二甲苯浓度均低于最低检出限,在不同的通风模式下差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。展示服装、鞋类展馆的甲醛浓度为0.087(0.079,0.091)mg·m-3,高于展示游戏、动漫周边产品的展馆0.053(0.045,0.057)mg·m-3Z=-5.45,P < 0.001);氨、苯、甲苯、二甲苯、TVOC在不同展品展馆内的浓度差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。健康风险评估结果显示:男性、女性的致癌风险分别为4.2×10-5、3.8×10-5,属于可接受水平,为低风险;男性、女性的总危害商值分别为0.025 0、0.0219,属于低风险。
    结论 本研究显示大型展会部分室内污染物存在一定的超标现象,通风模式、展品类型对室内污染物浓度均会产生影响,从业人员致癌风险和非致癌风险都处于可接受水平。

     

    Abstract:
    Background The main sources of indoor pollution in exhibition halls are exhibition materials and exhibits. Especially in large exhibitions where there are numerous and varied exhibition materials and insufficient time for volatilization, the indoor air pollution may post potential health risks to the large number of participants.
    Objective This study investigates the indoor air pollution status of large-scale exhibitions and the health risks of employees, aiming to provide a scientific basis for the improvement of indoor air quality of large-scale exhibitions and the formulation of effective control measures.
    Methods Formaldehyde, benzene, toluene, xylene, ammonia, and total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) were monitored in 9 exhibition halls of a large-scale exhibition center in Shanghai from July to September in 2019 and 2020 respectively, and evaluated in accordance with Hygienic indicators and limits for public places (GB 37488-2019). The health risk assessment model of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was used to perform health risk assessment of employees. In addition, the monitoring results in different ventilation conditions and of different exhibits were analyzed and compared.
    Results The overall qualified rate of indoor air in the selected large exhibition center in Shanghai was 96.3% (182/189). The unqualified indoor air pollutants included formaldehyde (98.4% qualified), ammonia (99.5% qualified), and TVOC (98.4% qualified). In the "fresh air+doors open" mode, the M (P25, P75) concentrations of the four indoor air pollutants were 0.041 (0.033, 0.047), 0.028 (ND, 0.039), 0.006 (ND, 0.020), and 0.100 (0.062, 0.190) mg·m-3, respectively; in the "fresh air+return air+doors closed" mode, the concentrations of the four indoor air pollutants were 0.050 (0.038, 0.063), 0.040 (0.035, 0.070), 0.019 (ND, 0.028), and 0.155 (0.095, 0.253) mg·m-3, respectively. The concentrations of above four indoor air pollutants in the mode of "fresh air+doors open" were all lower than those in the mode of "fresh air+return air+doors closed". The concentrations of toluene and xylene were lower than the limits of detection, and showed no differences between different ventilation modes (P>0.05). As to the results in different exhibition halls, the formaldehyde concentration in exhibition halls displaying clothing and footwear0.087 (0.079, 0.091) mg·m-3 was higher than that in exhibition halls displaying games and animation derivative products0.053 (0.045, 0.057) mg·m-3 (Z=-5.45, P < 0.001). There was no difference in the concentrations of ammonia, benzene, toluene, xylene, and TVOC in the exhibition halls of different exhibits (P>0.05). The results of health risk assessment of staff in the exhibition center showed that the carcinogenic risks of males and females were 4.2×10-5 and 3.8×10-5 respectively, indicating an acceptable level and a low risk. The total hazard indexes for males and females were 0.0250 and 0.0219 respectively, both indicating a low risk.
    Conclusion This study shows that some indoor air pollutants in the selected large-scale exhibition center exceed the national standards. Ventilation mode and exhibit type have an impact on indoor air pollutant concentration. Both the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks of employees are at acceptable levels.

     

/

返回文章
返回