轮班作业与2型糖尿病关联的病例对照研究

A case-control study on association between shift work and type 2 diabetes mellitus

  • 摘要:
    背景 随着经济发展和全球化推进,轮班作业在众多行业中成为常态,其与2型糖尿病(T2DM)的关系备受关注。
    目的 深入探讨轮班作业与T2DM之间的关联,分析不同轮班模式对T2DM的具体影响,为制定合理轮班制度提供依据。
    方法 采用1∶2配对病例对照设计,选取2023年11—12月在无锡市第八人民医院进行职业健康体检的20~60岁成年人为研究对象。病例组为200例确诊T2DM患者,对照组按年龄分层匹配了400例非T2DM患者。通过标准化问卷调查收集一般人口学特征、行为习惯、疾病史及确诊前5年的轮班作业情况(包括轮班模式、频率、工龄等)。采用多因素logistic回归模型校正多种混杂因素后,分析轮班作业与T2DM的关联性。
    结果 多因素logistic回归分析显示,轮班作业与T2DM风险相关,校正混杂因素后轮班工作者患T2DM的风险是非轮班工作者的3.55倍(95%CI:1.026~12.263)。不同轮班模式的风险存在差异,三班两倒风险最高(OR=4.17,95%CI:1.921~9.035),其次为两班倒(OR=2.94,95%CI:2.016~4.281)和四班三倒(OR=2.66, 95%CI:1.611~6.093)。每月轮班>3 d者风险是不轮班者的2.74倍(95%CI:1.658~4.512)。此外,每天工作>8 h(OR=1.74,95%CI:1.185~2.562)和工龄>20年(OR=2.51,95%CI:1.581~3.976)均增加T2DM风险。趋势检验显示,每月轮班天数和工龄每增加一个等级,T2DM风险分别增加2.61倍(95%CI:1.813~3.765)和1.49倍(95%CI:1.147~1.931)(P<0.05)。
    结论 本研究证实轮班作业是T2DM的独立危险因素,其中三班两倒模式风险最高。轮班频率、工作时长及工龄等因素均影响T2DM的发生风险。这些发现为制定行业轮班规范提供了依据,建议对高风险轮班模式(如三班两倒、高频轮班)及长期轮班(工龄>20年)人群实施定期血糖监测和健康干预。

     

    Abstract:
    Background With economic development and globalization, shift work has become prevalent across industries. Its relationship with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) attracts increasing attention.
    Objective To thoroughly explore the relationship between shift work and T2DM, and analyze the impacts of specific shift patterns on T2DM, so as to provide a basis for formulating reasonable shift schedules.
    Methods We conducted a 1:2 matched case-control study among adults (20-60 years) who ordered occupational health examinations at the Wuxi No.8 People's Hospital from November to December 2023. The case group comprised 200 T2DM patients, while the controls were 400 age-stratified matched non-diabetic individuals. General demographic characteristics, behavioral habits, medical history, and shift work exposure data (including shift patterns, frequency, and length of service) 5 years prior to diagnosis were collected through standardized questionnaires. Logistic regression adjusted for selected confounders was employed to evaluate the association between shift work and T2DM.
    Results The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that shift work was associated with an increased risk of T2DM. After adjusting for confounding factors, shift workers had a 3.55 times higher risk of being diagnosed T2DM compared to non-shift workers (OR=3.55, 95%CI: 1.026, 12.263). The risk varied across different shift patterns, and the three-shift two-rotation system showed the highest risk (OR=4.17, 95%CI: 1.921, 9.035), followed by the two-shift system (OR=2.94, 95%CI: 2.016, 4.281) and four-shift three-rotation system (OR=2.66, 95%CI: 1.611, 6.093). Workers with more than 3 monthly shift days had a 2.74-fold increased risk (95%CI: 1.658, 4.512) compared to non-shift workers. Additionally, working more than 8 h daily (OR=1.74, 95%CI: 1.185, 2.562) and having more than 20 years of service (OR=2.51, 95%CI: 1.581, 3.976) were both significantly associated with a higher T2DM risk. The trend tests revealed that each incremental increase in monthly shift days and length of service elevated T2DM risk by 2.61 times (95%CI: 1.813, 3.765) and 1.49 times (95%CI: 1.147, 1.931), respectively (P<0.05).
    Conclusion Shift work is an independent risk factor for T2DM, with three-shift two-rotation system posing the highest risk. Shift frequency, daily working hours, and length of service are all significant factors affecting the risk of T2DM. These findings support industry-specific shift policy reform and targeted glucose monitoring and health interventions are recommended for workers engaged in high-risk shift patterns (e.g., three-shift two-rotation system, frequent shifts) and those with prolonged shift work history (>20 years).

     

/

返回文章
返回