硬质金属工具制造企业工人钴及其化合物的皮肤接触分析

Skin contact of cobalt and its compounds in workers of hard metal tool manufacturing enterprises

  • 摘要:
    背景 我国是全球最大的钴生产国和消费国,皮肤接触过量钴会导致接触性皮炎等症状,但目前对钴及其化合物的皮肤接触及其危害研究较少。
    目的 研究钴及其化合物的皮肤接触特征。
    方法 于2024年2月,采用横断面调查研究方法以某硬质金属工具制造企业70名工人为研究对象,按其工作岗位分为混粉、烧结、自动压制、磨加工4组,通过问卷调查形式获取研究对象一般资料,通过个体采样器采集工作场所空气样品,采用电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定工作场所空气中钴浓度,通过棉拭子擦拭研究对象额头皮肤采集皮肤样品,在工人结束当天工作30 min内采集工人尿液样品,弃去尿比重不合格样本,通过电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定拭子提取液和尿中钴浓度。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验对连续变量进行多组间比较,Mann-whitney U检验进行两两比较,卡方检验对分类变量进行比较,采用Spearman秩相关分析探讨钴的皮肤接触水平与空气接触水平、尿钴之间的相关性。
    结果 研究对象8 h时间加权平均容许浓度(CTWA-8 h)的 \barx\pm s 为(2.30±2.15) μg·m−3;皮肤接触水平中位数为53.8 ng·cm−2,范围为4.25~1090.2 ng·cm−2;尿中钴水平中位数为3.74 µg·L−1,范围为0.83~382.9 µg·L−1。不同岗位间CTWA-8 h水平、皮肤钴接触水平和尿中钴水平差异均有统计学意义(H=9.012,P=0.029;H=16.348,P<0.001;H=11.078,P=0.011)。皮肤钴接触水平和尿中钴水平呈正相关(r=0.537,P<0.01)。
    结论 皮肤接触可能是尿中钴水平的主要来源之一,工人应加强皮肤防护和清洁意识。

     

    Abstract:
    Background China is the world's largest producer and consumer of cobalt. Skin exposure to excess cobalt can cause symptoms such as contact dermatitis. At present, there are few studies on skin contact of cobalt and its compounds.
    Objective To investigate the skin contact characteristics of cobalt and its compounds.
    Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in February 2024 involving 70 workers from a hard metal tool manufacturing company and the workers were divided into four groups according to their job positions: powder mixing, sintering, automatic pressing, and grinding processing. General demographic information was collected through questionnaires. Workplace air samples were collected using personal samplers, and cobalt concentrations in workplace air were measured by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). Skin samples were collected from the workers' foreheads using cotton swabs, and urine samples were collected within 30 min after the end of their shift. Urine specific gravity was measured immediately after collection, and disqualified samples were discarded. Cobalt concentrations in the swab extracts and urine were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis test for multiple group comparisons, Mann-WhitneyU test for pairwise comparisons, Chi-square test for categorical variables, and Spearman's rank correlation analysis to examine the correlations among air, dermal, and urinary cobalt levels.
    Results The 8 h time-weighted average (TWA) cobalt concentration was (2.30±2.15) μg·m−3 ( \barx\pm s ). The median skin exposure level was 53.8 ng·cm−2, with a range of 4.25 ng·cm−2 to 1090.2 ng·cm−2. The median urinary cobalt level was 3.74 µg·L−1, with a range of 0.83 to 382.9 µg·L−1. Statistically significant differences in TWA cobalt concentration, skin exposure levels, and urinary cobalt levels were found between different work positions (H=9.012, P=0.029; H=16.348, P<0.001; H=11.078, P=0.011). A positive correlation was observed between skin exposure levels and urinary cobalt levels (r=0.537, P<0.01).
    Conclusion Skin contact may be one of the main sources of cobalt levels in urine. Therefore, it is essential for workers to improve skin protection and hygiene practices.

     

/

返回文章
返回