2019年南方某市PM2.5金属和类金属元素组分的分布特征、源解析及健康风险评估

Distribution characteristics, source apportionment, and health risk assessment of metals and metalloids in PM2.5 in a southern city in 2019

  • 摘要:
    背景 细颗粒物(PM2.5)中的金属和类金属元素会对人体的呼吸和循环系统造成损伤,长期接触可能导致机体产生慢性中毒和致癌等不良效应。
    目的 评估南方某市室外PM2.5中金属和类金属元素的分布特征,进行源解析并评估健康风险,为进一步采取污染控制措施提供理论支撑。
    方法 在某市A、B、C区采集PM2.5样品,使用电感耦合等离子体质谱仪(ICP-MS)分析17种金属和类金属元素质量浓度(后简称“浓度”),富集因子结合主成分分析法识别其污染源,运用绝对主成分得分-多元线性回归(APCS-MLR)模型定量解析主要污染源,依据WS/T 777—2021《化学物质环境健康风险评估技术指南》评估当地居民的健康风险。
    结果 某市PM2.5浓度呈春冬季偏高、夏秋季偏低趋势,A、B、C区PM2.5年均浓度分别为36.7、31.9、24.4 μg·m−3,B、C区未超过GB 3095—2012《环境空气质量标准》二级标准限值。镉(Cd)、铝(Al)、锑(Sb)的富集因子>10,铜(Cu)、铅(Pb)、砷(As)、镍(Ni)、汞(Hg)、钼(Mo)的富集因子在1~10之间,锰(Mn)、钒(V)、铬(Cr)、钴(Co)、钡(Ba)、铍(Be)、铀(U)的富集因子≤1。源解析综合评价,A、C区和总体主要污染源是燃煤源,B区主要污染源是燃煤源,其次是工业工艺过程源、扬尘源。PM2.5中Cr和As致癌风险在1×10−6~1×10−4之间,15种金属和类金属慢性非致癌风险危险商均<1。
    结论 某市PM2.5中Cr和As具有一定的致癌风险,应引起关注;针对工业、扬尘和燃煤等可能污染源采取有效防控措施。

     

    Abstract:
    Background Metals and metalloids in fine particulate matter (PM2.5) may cause damage to the respiratory and circulatory systems of the human body, and long-term exposure is prone to causing chronic poisoning, cancer, and other adverse effects.
    Objective To assess the distribution characteristics of metals and metalloids in outdoor PM2.5 in a southern city of China, conduct source apportionment, and evaluate the associated health risks, thereby providing theoretical support for further pollution control measures.
    Methods PM2.5 samples were collected in districts A, B, and C of a southern China city, and the concentrations of 17 metals and metalloids were detected by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Pollution sources were assessed through enrichment factor and principal components analysis, and the main pollution sources were quantified using absolute principal component scores-multivariate linear regression (APCS-MLR). Health risks were evaluated based on the Technical guide for environmental health risk assessment of chemical exposure (WS/T777—2021).
    Results The ambient air PM2.5 concentrations in the city were higher in winter and spring, and lower in summer and autumn. The annual average concentrations of ambient PM2.5 in districts A, B, and C were 36.7, 31.9, and 24.4 μg·m−3, respectively. The ambient PM2.5 levels in districts B and C were below the second-grade limit set by the Ambient air quality standards (GB 3095—2012). The enrichment factors of cadmium (Cd), aluminum (Al), and antimony (Sb) were greater than 10, those of copper (Cu), lead (Pb), arsenic (As), nickel (Ni), mercury (Hg), and molybdenum (Mo) fell between 1 and 10, and those of manganese (Mn), vanadium (V), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), barium (Ba), beryllium (Be), and uranium (U) were below or equal to 1. The comprehensive evaluation of source analysis showed that the main pollution sources in districts A and C and the whole city were coal-burning. In district B, the main pollution source was also coal combustion, followed by industrial process sources and dust sources. The carcinogenic risks of As and Cr were between 1×10−6 and 1×10−4. However, the hazard quotients for 15 metals and metalloids in terms of non-carcinogenic risk were below 1.
    Conclusion Cr and As in the atmospheric PM2.5 of the city present a certain risk of cancer and should be paid attention to. In addition, preventive control measures should be taken against relevant pollution sources such as industrial emission, dust, and coal burning.

     

/

返回文章
返回