基于定性监测的工作场所空气中重点挥发性有机物监测及职业健康风险评估

Monitoring and occupational health risk assessment of key volatile organic compounds in workplace air based on qualitative monitoring

  • 摘要:
    背景 工作场所职业病危害因素往往是通过现场调查和以往存在的危害因素确定监测项目,较少对监测结果做职业健康风险评估。
    目的 基于化学品中挥发性有机物定性结果,监测8种工作场所空气中挥发性有机物,并对有机物含量超标的岗位进行职业健康风险评估。
    方法 本研究对重庆5个区县,按照《重庆市工作场所职业病危害因素监测工作方案(2023年)》附表列出的重点行业和重点岗位,从12个重点行业抽取29家企业,选取喷漆、刷胶、调胶、粘胶、印刷、黏合、包装、油膜、投料、备料、分散、含浸等49个重点岗位使用的化学品作顶空处理,顶空气中的挥发性有机物经气相色谱毛细管色谱柱分离后依次进入质谱仪检测,通过美国国家技术标准与技术研究院标准谱库和保留时间对各组分进行定性分析。基于定性结果确定监测岗位及危害因素,采取工作场所空气样品进行重点危害因素的定量检测,并应用半定量评估的接触比值评估法对超标岗位进行职业健康风险评估。
    结果 29家用人单位使用的化学品中均检出8种重点危害因素的一种或几种,其中二甲苯(89.7%)和甲苯(86.2%)的检出率最高,其次为苯(34.5%)、1,2-二氯乙烷(31.0%)和乙苯(20.7%),正己烷(10.3%)和三氯甲烷(6.9%)的检出率较低,此次定性检测未检出三氯乙烯。工作场所空气中职业病危害因素定量检测中,检出率最高的危害因素为二甲苯(70.6%)和乙苯(83.3%),超标率最高的危害因素为1,2-二氯乙烷(50.0%)。29家中有8家用人单位工作场所空气存在重点危害因素超标,主要岗位为喷漆和含浸。有1家喷漆岗位同时有3种危害因素超标,1家喷漆岗位同时有2种危害因素超标。3家企业的喷漆岗位 1,2-二氯乙烷风险等级为高风险。2家多种危害因素超标的企业联合风险均为高风险。
    结论 本次研究工作场所化学品中苯系物和1,2-二氯乙烷检出较高,3家企业的喷漆岗位1,2-二氯乙烷的风险等级为高风险,在今后的监测中需重点关注。

     

    Abstract:
    Background Occupational hazards in the workplace are often determined through on-site investigations and recognized hazards to determine monitoring items, and occupational health risk assessments are rarely carried out on the monitoring results.
    Objective Based on the qualitative results of volatile organic compounds, to monitor 8 types of volatile organic compounds in workplace air, and conduct occupational health risk assessments for workstations with disqualified results.
    Methods This study selected 29 enterprises from 12 key industries listed in the Work Plan for Monitoring Occupational Disease Hazards in Workplaces in Chongqing (2023) in 5 districts and counties of Chongqing. A total of 49 key workstations, including spray painting, glue brushing, glue adjustment, adhesion, printing, bonding, packing, oil film, feeding, material preparation,dispersion, and immersion, were selected for air sampling and chemical headspace treatment. The volatile organic compounds in the headspace were separated with a gas chromatography capillary column and sequentially entered into a mass spectrometer for detection. Qualitative analysis of each component was conducted using the National Institute of Technical Standards and Technology standard spectrum library and retention time. Based on the qualitative results, chemical hazards and related workstations were determined, then quantitative evaluation was conducted for key hazards in workplace air, and followed by occupational health risk assessment for the disqualified workstations using semi-quantitative exposure ratio.
    Results One or more of the 8 key chemical hazards were positive in the 29 enterprises, among which xylene (89.7%) and toluene (86.2%) had the highest positive rates, followed by benzene (34.5%), 1,2-dichloroethane (31.0%), ethylbenzene (20.7%), n-hexane (10.3%), and trichloromethane (6.9%), and trichloroethylene was negative. In the quantitative evaluation for occupational hazards in workplace air, the highest positive rates of chemical hazards were xylene (70.6%) and ethylbenzene (83.3%), and the highest disqualification rate of chemical hazards was 1,2-dichloroethane (50.0%). Out of the 29 enterprises, 8 reported disqualified air key chemical hazards, mainly in the workstations of spray painting and immersion. One spray painting workstation reported 3 disqualified chemical hazards, and one spary painting workstation reported 2 disqualified chemical hazards. The risk level of 1,2-dichloroethane in the spary painting workstations of 3 enterprises was high. The joint risk of 2 enterprises with multiple disqualified chemical hazards was high.
    Conclusion The positive rates of benzene derivatives and 1,2-dichloroethane in workplace chemicals are high in this study. The risk level of 1,2-dichloroethane in the spary painting workstations of 3 companies is high, and this substance needs special attention in future monitoring.

     

/

返回文章
返回