QuEChERS结合超高效液相色谱-四极杆/静电场轨道阱高分辨质谱法测定PM2.5中氯化石蜡含量

Determination of chlorinated paraffins in PM2.5 by QuEChERS combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole/orbitrap high resolution mass spectrometry

  • 摘要:
    背景 既往空气细颗粒物(PM2.5)中氯化石蜡(CPs)的研究多集中在短链及中链(SCCPs、MCCPs),少有研究同时定量检测其中的短、中、长链氯化石蜡(LCCPs)。建立一种同时提取并测定PM2.5中SCCPs、MCCPs、LCCPs的方法可为其环境监测和人类健康风险评估提供技术支持。
    目的 QUEChERS前处理方法结合超高效液相色谱串联四极杆/静电场轨道阱高分辨质谱,建立同时测定PM2.5中SCCPs、MCCPs、LCCPs的方法。
    方法 优化QuEChERS方法的提取溶剂、提取盐和提取步骤,依次比较4种提取溶剂乙腈、二氯甲烷和正己烷溶剂依次提取;乙腈∶二氯甲烷∶正己烷=1∶1∶2(v/v/v)混合溶剂;1%乙酸-乙腈∶二氯甲烷∶正己烷=1∶1∶1(v/v/v)混合溶剂;乙腈∶二氯甲烷∶正己烷=1∶1∶1(v/v/v)混合溶剂、2种除水盐(无水MgSO4+NaCl和无水Na2SO4+NaCl)、2种净化盐(C18和PSA)和4种涡旋时间(5、7.5、10、12.5 min)条件下目标物质的提取效率。采用内标法对样品进行定量分析,并对优化后的QuEChERS方法进行线性范围、检出限等方法学指标的评估。
    结果 SCCPs、MCCPs、LCCPs在10~1000 ng·mL−1范围内线性关系良好,相关系数(R2)均大于0.96。方法检出限(MDLs)为0.01~0.29 ng·m−3。SCCPs、MCCPs、LCCPs在低、中、高三个浓度的加标回收率范围分别为77.38%~81.64%、93.11%~99.78%、87.41%~101.39%,相对标准偏差(RSD)为2.90%~12.84%。采用本方法对石家庄11个PM2.5样品中的CPs水平进行了测定,∑SCCPs、∑MCCPs和∑LCCPs检出率均为100%,质量浓度范围分别为0.24~2.18 ng·m−3(均值为0.84 ng·m−3)、0.17~1.67 ng·m−3(均值为0.70 ng·m−3)和0.01~0.16 ng·m−3(均值为0.04 ng·m−3),在ΣCPs中的占比分别为52.95%、44.39%和2.66%。
    结论 本研究所建立的方法操作简便、耗时短、溶剂消耗少,且可同时检测PM2.5中SCCPs、MCCPs、LCCPs,适用于PM2.5样品大批量测定,也可为PM2.5中其他卤代有机物的检测方法提供参考。

     

    Abstract:
    Background Previous research on chlorinated paraffins (CPs) in fine particulate matter (PM2.5) has predominantly focused on short- and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs and MCCPs), and few studies could simultaneously determine short-, medium-, and long-chain chlorinated paraffins (LCCPs). Simultaneous extraction and determination of SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs in PM2.5 could provide technical support for their environmental monitoring and human health risk assessment.
    Objective To establish a method based on QUEChERS pretreatment method in conjunction with ultra-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole/orbitrap high resolution mass spectrometry for simultaneously determining the levels of SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs in PM2.5.
    Methods The extraction solvents, extraction salts, and extraction steps of a QuEChERS method were optimized. The extraction efficiencies of the target substances were compared under 4 extraction solvents acetonitrile, dichloromethane, and n-hexane solvents in sequence; acetonitrile: dichloromethane: n-hexane = 1: 1: 2 (v/v/v) mixed solvent; 1% acetic acid-acetonitrile: dichloromethane: n-hexane = 1: 1: 1 (v/v/v) mixed solvent; acetonitrile: dichloromethane: n-hexane = 1: 1: 1 (v/v/v) mixed solvent, 2 dehydrated salts (anhydrous MgSO4+NaCl and anhydrous Na2SO4+NaCl), 2 purification salts (C18 and PSA), and 4 vortex time (5, 7.5, 10, and 12.5 min) conditions. Then internal standard was utilized to estimate linear range and detection limit of the refined QuEChERS approach.
    Results The linearities of SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs were good in the range of 10~1000 ng·mL−1 with the correlation coefficients all greater than 0.96. The method detection limits (MDLs) ranged from 0.01 to 0.29 ng·m−3. The spiked recoveries of SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs at the low, medium, and high concentrations were 77.38%-81.64%, 93.11%-99.78%, and 87.41%-101.39%, respectively, and the relative standard deviations (RSDs) were 2.90%-12.84%. This method was used to determine the CPs levels in 11 PM2.5 samples from Shijiazhuang. The positive rates of ∑SCCPs, ∑MCCPs, and ∑LCCPs were all 100%, the concentration ranges were 0.24-2.18 ng·m−3 (mean 0.84 ng·m−3), 0.17-1.67 ng·m−3 (mean 0.70 ng·m−3), and 0.01-0.16 ng·m−3 (mean 0.04 ng·m−3), respectively, and the percentages to ΣCPs were 52.95%, 44.39%, and 2.66%, respectively.
    Conclusion The method established in this study is simple, time-saving, solvent saving, and can simultaneously detect SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs in PM2.5, which is suitable for the determination of PM2.5 samples in large quantities, and can also provide a reference for the detection methods of other halogenated organic compounds in PM2.5.

     

/

返回文章
返回