辅助生殖与自然妊娠孕妇全氟及多氟烷基化合物暴露水平及其社会人口学影响因素的比较分析

Concentrations and sociodemographic determinants of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in women pregnant using assisted reproduction technology in comparison with women pregnant naturally

  • 摘要:
    背景 全氟及多氟烷基化合物(PFAS)作为一种持久性有机污染物在人体内普遍检出,其毒性也引起了广泛的关注,但对于辅助生殖与自然妊娠孕妇的PFAS暴露水平与影响因素的比较鲜有报道。
    目的 分析并比较上海市辅助生殖和自然妊娠孕妇血清中PFAS的浓度及影响PFAS水平的社会人口学因素。
    方法 以国家出生队列(CNBC)在上海地区2017—2019年同期招募的333例接受辅助生殖技术治疗后怀孕的孕妇和689例自然怀孕的孕妇为研究对象,检测了所有孕妇孕早期的血清中32种PFAS的浓度,将两组人群共同暴露水平最高的四种PFAS纳入后续分析,采用多因素线性回归分别分析两组人群人口学特征对血清PFAS浓度的影响,计算β值及其95%可信区间的指数转换值以代表自变量每变化一个单位后PFAS浓度几何均数(GM)的比值。
    结果 全氟辛酸(PFOA)、全氟辛基磺酸(PFOS)、6∶2氯代聚氟烷基醚磺酸(6∶2 Cl-PFESA)、全氟己烷磺酸(PFHxS)是辅助生殖孕妇和自然妊娠孕妇血清中最主要的4种PFAS,且辅助生殖孕妇的PFOA、PFOS、6∶2 Cl-PFESA水平高于自然妊娠孕妇(P<0.05)。多因素线性回归的结果发现,怀孕年龄和家庭收入是影响两组人群血清PFAS暴露水平的共性因素。怀孕年龄≥35岁的辅助生殖和自然妊娠孕妇相比怀孕年龄<30岁的各组孕妇的血清PFOS水平分别增加至1.26(95%CI:1.04~1.54)倍和1.24(95%CI:1.08~1.42)倍。相比两组人群家庭年收入<200000元的孕妇,家庭年收入>300000元的辅助生殖孕妇和自然妊娠孕妇血清PFOAGM比值(95%CI)分别为0.82(0.72~0.95)和0.89(0.81~0.97)和PFHxSGM比值(95%CI)分别为0.66(0.51~0.86)和0.77(0.66~0.90)浓度较低。此外,研究生及以上教育水平比本科以下教育水平的自然妊娠孕妇血清中6∶2 Cl-PFESA浓度低(GM比值:0.81),经产比初产的自然妊娠孕妇血清中PFOS、6∶2 Cl-PFESA和PFHxS浓度增加(GM比值分别为1.14、1.25和1.27)。
    结论 尽管本研究发现上海地区辅助生殖孕妇和自然妊娠孕妇体内血清PFAS水平存在差异,但是孕妇年龄和家庭收入为两组人群PFAS暴露水平的共同影响因素,而未发现辅助生殖孕妇不同于自然妊娠孕妇的特殊的社会人口学影响因素,未来需要进一步探究其他可能因素的影响。

     

    Abstract:
    Background Per- and polyfuoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are categorized as persistent organic pollutants and commonly detected in humans, and their toxicity has attracted widespread attention. However, few studies have reported comparison of PFAS levels and potential factors between women pregnant using assisted reproduction technology (ART) and women pregnant naturally.
    Objective To analyze and compare serum concentrations and sociodemographic determinants of PFAS in pregnant women conceiving through ART and conceiving naturally from Shanghai.
    Methods Based on the China National Birth Cohort (CNBC) in Shanghai from 2017 to 2019, 333 pregnant women conceiving through ART and 689 pregnant women conceiving naturally were recruited during the same period as study subjects. The concentrations of 32 PFAS were measured in early-pregnancy serum of all pregnant women, and four PFAS with the highest co-exposure levels in both groups were included in the subsequent analysis. Multiple linear regression models were performed to evaluate the associations of sociodemographic factors with serum PFAS concentrations in the two groups respectively. Beta coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were exponentiated to calculate the ratio of the geometric mean (GM) of PFAS concentrations after each unit change in the independent variable.
    Results Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), 6∶2 chlorinated polyfluoroethersulfonic acid (6∶2 Cl-PFESA), and perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS) were four major PFAS in serum of pregnant women conceiving through ART and conceiving naturally, and the concentrations of PFOA, PFOS, and 6∶2 Cl-PFESA were higher in pregnant women conceiving through ART than in pregnant women conceiving naturally (P <0.05). The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that age at pregnancy and household income were associated with serum PFAS levels in both groups. The serum concentrations of PFOS were higher in pregnant women aged ≥35 years old who conceiving through ART (GM ratio=1.26, 95%CI: 1.04, 1.54) and conceiving naturally (GM ratio=1.24, 95%CI: 1.08, 1.42) than pregnant women aged <30 years old respectively. Pregnant women conceiving through ART and conceiving naturally whose household annual income >300000 CNY had lower serum concentrations of PFOA GM ratio (95%CI): 0.82 (0.72, 0.95) and 0.89 (0.81, 0.97), respectively and PFHxS GM ratio (95%CI): 0.66 (0.51, 0.86) and 0.77 (0.66, 0.90), respectively than those women whose household annual income <200000 CNY. Additionally, pregnant women conceiving naturally with a graduate education or above had lower serum 6∶2 Cl-PFESA concentrations than women with an education below college (GM ratio: 0.81), and multiparous pregnant women conceiving naturally had higher serum concentrations of PFOS, 6∶2 Cl-PFESA, and PFHxS than primiparous pregnant women (GM ratio: 1.14, 1.25, and 1.27 respectively).
    Conclusion Although differences in serum PFAS levels are found between pregnant women conceiving through ART and women conceiving naturally in this study, maternal age and household income are common determinants of PFAS exposure levels in both populations. We find no special sociodemographic factors to affect PFAS concentrations of pregnant women conceiving through ART compared to pregnant women conceiving naturally. Further research is required to explore other potential factors.

     

/

返回文章
返回