中国老年人口自评健康的省域分布差异及影响因素

Provincial distribution differences and influencing factors of self-assessed health among elderly population in China

  • 摘要:
    背景 经济发展、自然环境、医疗水平、社会结构等区域差异,可能导致老年人口健康存在省域分布差异。
    目的 揭示老年自评健康的省域分布特征、区域差异及影响因素,旨在为因地制宜改善老年人口健康及促进健康老龄化提供政策依据。
    方法 以中国31个省(直辖市、自治区)为研究单元,基于Wagstaff的方法,将2010、2020年全国人口普查和2015年全国1%人口抽样调查中各省60岁及以上人口自评健康数据转换为健康不良得分,作为衡量各省老年自评健康的指标,得分越高,自评健康越差。采用全局莫兰指数分析空间相关性,取值范围为−1, 1,绝对值越趋近于1,空间相关性越强;局部莫兰指数探究局部关联程度,高-高聚集/低-低聚集表示该省份与周边省份健康不良得分均较高/低。通过拉格朗日乘子检验和Hausman检验选取空间计量模型,探究老年自评健康的影响因素。
    结果 2010、2015、2020年全国老年人口健康不良得分为1.831、1.873、1.547,全局莫兰指数为0.347、0.482、0.511(P<0.01),表明老年人口健康不良得分呈显著空间正相关,且空间聚集程度逐渐增强;2010—2020年老年人口健康不良得分高-高聚集地区集中于西北内陆,低-低聚集集中于东南沿海,逐步呈“东南-中-西北”阶梯式递增的分异格局。拉格朗日乘子检验和Hausman检验结果显示固定效应空间滞后模型是较优选择,其回归结果显示:老年人口健康不良得分存在空间自相关,自相关系数为0.3969(P<0.001);老年人口健康不良得分与人均地区生产总值的自然对数、每千人口医疗机构床位数呈负相关,回归系数为−0.8297、−0.0454(P<0.05);与PM2.5年平均浓度、文盲率、每千人口卫生技术人员数呈正相关,回归系数分别为0.0033、0.0297、0.0765(P<0.05)。
    结论 2010—2020年中国老年人口自评健康水平整体呈上升趋势,但存在显著空间正相关,东南沿海老年自评健康较好,西北内陆较差,老年自评健康在空间分布上由东南向中至西北逐级变差。经济发展水平、环境污染、卫生资源配置、受教育水平是老年自评健康的重要影响因素。

     

    Abstract:
    Background Regional differences in economic development, natural environment, health care level, and social structure may lead to differences in the provincial distribution of the health status of the elderly population.
    Objective To explore the provincial distribution characteristics, regional differences, and influencing factors of the self-assessed health of the elderly population, with the aim of providing a policy basis for improving the health of the elderly population and promoting healthy aging according to local conditions.
    Methods Using 31 provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions) in China as the basicstudy unit and based on the method of Wagstaff, the self-rated health data of the elderly population (aged 60 years and above) in each province from the 2010 and 2020 national censuses and the 2015 1% National Population Sample Survey were converted into ill-health scores as a measure of self-assessed health, and higher scores represented worse health status perception. Global Moran's I was used to evaluate spatial autocorrelation, range −1, 1, with a value of 1 as a perfect clustered pattern. Local Moran's I was used to evaluate the tendency of local autocorrelation, and high-high aggregation/low-low aggregation indicated that both target province and its neighboring provinces showed higher/lower ill-health scores. Spatial econometric models were selected by Lagrange multiplier test and Hausman test to explore influencing factors of the self-assessed health of the elderly population.
    Results In 2010, 2015, and 2020, the national ill-health scores of the elderly population were 1.831, 1.873, and 1.547, respectively, and the corresponding Global Moran's I statistics were 0.347, 0.482, and 0.511, respectively (P<0.01), indicating that the ill-health scores of the elderly population showed a significant spatial positive autocorrelation, and the degree of spatial aggregation was increasing gradually. From 2010 to 2020, the high-high aggregation of ill-health scores among the elderly population was concentrated in the inland northwest, while the low-low aggregation was concentrated in the southeast coast, gradually showing a "southeast-central-northwest" stepped incremental pattern of differentiation. The Lagrange multiplier test and Hausman test suggested that the fixed-effects spatial lagged model was a better choice, and the regression model showed a spatial autocorrelation in the ill-health scores of the elderly population, with an autocorrelation coefficient of 0.3969 (P<0.001); the ill-health scores of the elderly population were negatively correlated with the natural logarithms of gross regional product per capita, and the number of beds in health care facilities per 1000 population, with regression coefficients of −0.8297 and −0.0454 (P<0.05) respectively, and positively correlated with the annual average concentration of PM2.5, illiteracy rate, and the number of health technicians per 1000 population, with regression coefficients of 0.0033, 0.0297, and 0.0765 (P<0.05), respectively.
    Conclusion From 2010 to 2020, the overall self-assessed health level of China's elderly population showed an upward trend and a spatial positive autocorrelation, with better self-assessed health in the southeast coast and poorer ratings in the northwestern inland. Additionally, there was a gradual decline in self-assessed health of the elderly population from the southeast to the central regions and further to the northwest in terms of spatial distribution. Economic development level, environmental pollution, health resource allocation, and education level are important factors influencing the self-assessed health of the elderly population.

     

/

返回文章
返回