接噪工人听力阈值、自觉听力与负性情绪关系的路径分析

Path analysis on relationship among tested hearing thresholds, conscious hearing, and negative emotions in noise-exposed workers

  • 摘要:
    背景 噪声暴露与接噪工人负性情绪之间的关系已受到越来越多关注,目前对噪声暴露相关的负性情绪影响已有相关研究,但对噪声与负性情绪关系间的作用路径和效应研究缺少报道,对作用路径的研究将有助于更全面了解噪声除听力损失外的健康损害特征。
    目的 探讨接噪工人累积噪声暴露与听力阈值和自觉听力水平对负性情绪的影响路径及效应。
    方法 采用分层随机抽样,选取某机械设备制造企业的312名接噪工人为研究对象,使用《抑郁-焦虑-紧张量表(DASS-21量表)》和自制问卷调查接噪工人职业史、负性情绪(包括紧张感、焦虑感和抑郁感)和自觉听力水平,采用纯音气导听阈测试方法测定接噪工人听力阈值,使用噪声测量仪器对调查对象工作场所进行噪声等效声级的现场测定,根据场所噪声水平及工人噪声暴露史估算个体累积噪声暴露,采用路径分析法分析工人听力阈值和自觉听力水平在噪声暴露与负性情绪(包括紧张感、焦虑感和抑郁感)间的中介作用。
    结果 312名接噪工人负性情绪检出率分别为压力感18.27%(57/312),焦虑感46.79%(146/312)以及抑郁感28.53%(89/312);累积噪声暴露范围为101.0~136.1 dB(A)·d,均值为125.69 dB(A)·d。接噪工人听力阈值和自觉听力水平分布有较大不一致性(未加权Kappa值和加权Kappa值均小于0.4,P<0.001);自觉听力等级高于听阈等级者占16.0%,自觉听力等级低于听阈等级者占38.7%。路径分析结果显示,听力阈值水平在累积噪声暴露和负性情绪间无中介效应;自觉听力水平在累积噪声暴露和负性情绪间存在部分中介效应,中介效应值为0.06(95%CI:0.03~0.11),中介效应占比为28.57%。
    结论 接噪工人的自觉听力水平在累积噪声暴露与负性情绪间存在部分中介效应,而听力阈值在累积噪声暴露与负性情绪间无中介效应。

     

    Abstract:
    Background The correlation between noise exposure and negative emotions of noise-exposed workers has received increasing attention and related studies have been reported. However, there is a lack of research on the path and effect analysis of the relationship between noise exposure and negative emotions, which will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the health damage characteristics of noise in addition to hearing loss.
    Objective To explore the path and effects of cumulative noise exposure, tested hearing thresholds, and conscious hearing level of noise-exposed workers on negative emotions.
    Methods Using stratified random sampling, 312 noise-exposed workers from a machinery and equipment manufacturing enterprise were selected. Occupational history, negative emotions (including the feelings of stress, anxiety, and depression), and conscious hearing level of the workers were investigated using the Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale (DASS-21) and a self-made questionnaire. The hearing threshold of the workers was measured by pure tone air conduction audiometry. Sound level meter was used to measure noise equivalent sound level at selected work sites. Individual cumulative noise exposure was estimated based on work site noise level and personal noise exposure history. Path analysis was used to analyze potential mediating effects of workers' hearing thresholds and conscious hearing levels on the relationship between noise exposure and negative emotions (including stress, anxiety, and depression).
    Results The positive rates of negative emotions among the 312 noise-exposed workers were 18.27% (57/312) for stress, 46.79% (146/312) for anxiety, and 28.53% (89/312) for depression; the cumulative noise exposure ranged from 101.0 to 136.1 dB(A)·d, with an average of 125.69 dB(A)·d. The distributions of tested hearing thresholds and conscious hearing levels among the workers exposed to noise were significantly inconsistent (P<0.001), with both unweighted and weighted Kappa values less than 0.4. The percentage of workers with conscious hearing levels higher than their hearing threshold levels was 16.0%, and the percentage of workers with conscious hearing levels lower than conscious hearing levels was 38.7%. The path analysis results showed that tested hearing thresholds had no mediating effect on the relationship between cumulative noise exposure and negative emotions. There was a partial mediating effect of conscious hearing level on the relationship between cumulative noise exposure and negative emotions, with a mediating effect value of 0.06 (95%CI: 0.03, 0.11) and a mediating effect ratio of 28.57%.
    Conclusion Conscious hearing plays a partial mediating role in the relationship between cumulative noise exposure and negative emotions of noise-exposed workers, while tested hearing thresholds do not.

     

/

返回文章
返回