电网一线人员人格特质对心理健康的影响及工作家庭支持在二者关系的中介作用

Influence of personality traits on mental health and mediating role of work-family support among front-line power grid workers

  • 摘要:
    背景 电网一线作业人员常面临多种职业危险(如高空作业等),导致心理问题,从而影响工作效率和作业安全。
    目的 了解电网一线作业人员心理健康状况,探讨人格特质对心理健康的影响及工作家庭支持在二者关系的中介作用。
    方法 本研究为横断面研究,于2019年1月—6月,在广东某电网公司下属20个供电局中抽取2个供电局,选取其中电网一线作业人员共485人作为研究对象。调查其一般人口学特征,同时采用五因素人格量表、工作家庭支持量表和症状自评量表调查其人格特质、工作家庭支持和心理健康情况。采用Spearman相关性分析对各计量资料间的相关性进行分析;采用结构方程模型分析人格特质、工作家庭支持及心理健康之间的关系,同时使用Bootstrap法检验工作家庭支持在人格特质和心理健康之间的中介作用。
    结果 研究对象心理健康症状总分MP25,P75)为134.00(110.00,167.00)分。其中心理健康症状阳性的电网一线作业人员为139名,占28.66%。相关分析表明,电网一线作业人员中神经质人格得分与工作家庭支持总分呈负相关(rs=−0.356,P<0.001),和心理健康症状总分(rs=0.557,P<0.001)及其各子维度得分(rs=0.436~0.550,P<0.001)呈正相关;开放性人格得分和工作家庭支持总分呈正相关(rs=0.269,P<0.001),和心理健康症状的相关关系中,除了和偏执子维度得分之间的相关性没有统计学意义外(P>0.05),与其他子维度得分均呈负相关(rs=−0.091~−0.147,P<0.05);其余三种人格得分(外向性、宜人性、尽责性)与工作家庭支持总分(rs=0.331~0.466,P<0.001)呈正相关,和心理健康症状总分及其各子维度得分呈负相关(P<0.001)。修正后的结构方程模型显示:工作家庭支持对心理健康症状的直接效应为−0.225(P<0.001);外向性和开放性人格对工作家庭支持的直接效应为0.241(P<0.001)和0.123(P<0.05),而对心理健康症状的效应无统计学意义。神经质人格对工作家庭支持和心理健康症状的直接效应分别为−0.152(P<0.01)和0.467(P<0.001);尽责性人格对工作家庭支持和心理健康症状的直接效应均无统计学意义(P>0.05);宜人性人格对工作家庭支持的直接效应无统计学意义(P>0.05),对心理健康症状的直接效应为−0.180(P<0.001)。
    结论 电网一线作业人员心理健康症状得分较高。高神经质的电网一线作业人员更易产生心理健康症状。工作家庭支持在外向性和开放性人格对心理健康症状的影响中起完全中介作用,在神经质人格对心理健康的影响中起部分中介作用,在宜人性人格对心理健康的影响中无中介作用,提升工作家庭支持水平可有效改善心理健康状况。

     

    Abstract:
    Background Front-line power grid workers are required to face a variety of occupational hazards (such as aerial work), which make them susceptible to psychological problems and further reduce their performance efficiency and safety level.
    Objective To investigate the mental health status of front-line power grid workers and explore the influence of personality traits on mental health and the potential mediating role of work-family support between them.
    Methods This study was designed as a cross-sectional study. From January to June 2019, a cluster random sampling method was used to select two of the 20 power supply stations owned by a Guangdong power company. A total of 485 front-line power grid workers were included in the study. Sociodemographic characteristics were investigated, and NEO Five-Factor Inventory, Work-Family Support Scale, and Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) were used in the survey. Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to analyze the correlations between measured variables. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the relationships of personality traits, work-family support, and mental health, and Bootstrap analysis was used to test the mediating effect of work-family support on the relationship of personality traits and mental health.
    Results The M (P25, P75) of total SCL-90 score was 134.00 (110.00, 167.00), and 139 (28.66%) front-line power grid workers showed positive mental health symptoms. The correlation analysis indicated that among the front-line power grid workers, neuroticism score was negatively correlated with work-family support total score (rs=−0.356, P<0.001), and positively correlated with the total score of SCL-90 (rs=0.557, P<0.001) as well as all the scores of its sub-dimensions (rs=0.436-0.550, P<0.001). Openness score was positively correlated with work-family support total score (rs=0.269, P<0.001), and except for paranoid ideation (P>0.05), openness score was negatively correlated with the scores of all the other sub-dimensions of SCL-90 (rs=−0.091-−0.147, P<0.05). The scores of the other three personality traits (extroversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness) were positively correlated with work-family support total score (rs=0.331-0.466, P<0.001), and negatively correlated with the total score of SCL-90 as well as the scores of all its sub-dimensions (P<0.001). The modified structural equation modeling indicated that the direct effect of work-family support on mental health symptoms was −0.225 (P<0.001). The direct effects of extraversion and openness on work-family support were 0.241 (P<0.001) and 0.123 (P<0.05), respectively, while the effect on mental health symptoms was not statistically significant. The direct effects of neuroticism on work-family support and mental health symptoms were -0.152 (P<0.01) and 0.467 (P<0.001), respectively. The direct effects of conscientiousness on work-family support and mental health symptoms were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The direct effect of agreeableness on work-family support was not statistically significant (P>0.05), while the direct effect on mental health symptoms was −0.180 (P<0.001).
    Conclusion The front-line power grid workers show a high score of SCL-90. Workers with higher neuroticism are more vulnerable to mental health symptoms. Work-family support fully mediates the effects of extraversion and openness on mental health symptoms, and partially mediates the effects of neuroticism on mental health symptoms, while does not mediate the effects of agreeableness on mental health symptoms. Sufficient work-family support may improve mental health status.

     

/

返回文章
返回