职业紧张对煤矿工人职业倦怠的影响:工作家庭冲突的中介作用

Effect of occupational stress on job burnout among coal miners: The mediating role of work-family conflict

  • 摘要:
    背景 煤矿工人职业紧张和职业倦怠的发生现况较为严峻,严重影响其身心健康。
    目的 调查煤矿工人职业紧张、职业倦怠水平,并分析工作家庭冲突在二者之间的中介效应。
    方法 于2019年2—10月通过整群随机抽样法纳入1500名煤矿工人,使用付出-回报失衡量表(ERI)、工作家庭冲突量表和中文版职业倦怠量表对研究对象的职业紧张、工作家庭冲突及职业倦怠水平进行评价。比较不同人口统计学特征的煤矿工人职业紧张、工作家庭冲突与职业倦怠评分。指标相关性分析采用偏相关分析;运用SPSS AOMS 26.0软件对新疆煤矿工人职业紧张-工作家庭冲突-职业倦怠进行中介效应分析。
    结果 研究最终调查了1247名男性煤矿工人,有效问卷回收率为83.13%。职业倦怠得分的MP25P75)为55.00(47.00,62.00)分;除了性别和月收入之外,煤矿工人职业倦怠得分情况在其他人口学特征不同组间差异都有统计学意义(P<0.05)。煤矿工人ERI值、工作家庭冲突得分的MP25P75)分别为1.01(0.85,1.21)分、51.00(44.00,57.00)分;煤矿工人ERI值与职业倦怠(rs=0.212)、情感耗竭(rs=0.188)、人格解体(rs=0.244)的得分呈正相关(均P<0.01);工作家庭冲突与职业倦怠(rs=0.382)、情感耗竭(rs=0.360)、人格解体(rs=0.370)、成就感降低(rs=0.105)的得分也均呈正相关(均P<0.01)。回归结果显示职业紧张对职业倦怠和工作家庭冲突有正向作用(b=7.117,b=8.347,P<0.001),工作家庭冲突在职业紧张对职业倦怠作用中存在中介效应,其效应的作用值为0.249(占总效应0.489的50.92%,P=0.002)。
    结论 工作家庭冲突在煤矿工人发生职业紧张和职业倦怠之间充当中介角色,会间接影响倦怠的发生。

     

    Abstract:
    Background The highly prevalent of occupational stress and job burnout of coal miners seriously affect their physical and mental health.
    Objective To investigate the levels of occupational stress and job burnout in coal mine workers, and to analyze the mediating effect of work-family conflict between these two conditions.
    Methods A total of 1500 coal miners were included by random cluster sampling method from February to October 2019. The levels of occupational stress, work-family conflict, and job burnout of the study participants were evaluated using the Effort-Reward Imbalance Inventory scale (ERI), the Work-Family Conflict Scale, and the Chinese version of the Burnout Scale, and compared among coal miners with different demographic characteristics. Partial correlation analysis was used to find the correlations between indicators; SPSS AOMS 26.0 software was used to analyze the potential mediating effect among occupational stress, work-family conflict, and job burnout in the coal miners in Xinjiang.
    Results The study included 1247 male coal miners with a valid questionnaire return rate of 83.13%. The M (P25, P75) score of job burnout was 55.00 (47.00, 62.00). Except for gender and monthly income, the differences of job burnout scores among coal miners grouped with selected demographic characteristics were statistically significant (P<0.05). The M (P25, P75) scores of ERI and work-family conflict of coal miners were 1.01 (0.85, 1.21) and 51.00 (44.00, 57.00) respectively, and the differences of ERI and work-family conflict scores among different job types were statistically significant (P<0.05). ERI values were positively correlated with burnout (rs=0.212), emotional exhaustion (rs=0.188), and depersonalization (rs=0.244) scores (all P<0.01); work-family conflict scores were positively correlated with burnout (rs=0.382), emotional exhaustion (rs=0.360), depersonalization (rs=0.370), and reduced sense of accomplishment (rs=0.105) scores (all P<0.01). The regression results showed a significant positive effect of occupational stress on job burnout and work-family conflict (b=7.117, b=8.347, P<0.001), and a mediating effect of work-family conflict on the association between occupational stress and job burnout, with a mediating effect value of 0.249 (50.92% of the total effect of 0.489, P=0.002).
    Conclusion Work-family conflict may act as a mediating role between occupational stress and job burnout in coal miners, which suggests an indirect effect on occurrence of job burnout.

     

/

返回文章
返回