熊建菁, 王向东, 徐文燕, 顾峥奕. 闸北区中学生校内意外伤害干预效果评价[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2013, 30(6): 454-456.
引用本文: 熊建菁, 王向东, 徐文燕, 顾峥奕. 闸北区中学生校内意外伤害干预效果评价[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2013, 30(6): 454-456.
XIONG Jian-jing , WANG Xiang-dong , XU Wen-yan , GU Zheng-yi . Evaluation on Injury Intervention for Middle School Students in Zhabei District[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2013, 30(6): 454-456.
Citation: XIONG Jian-jing , WANG Xiang-dong , XU Wen-yan , GU Zheng-yi . Evaluation on Injury Intervention for Middle School Students in Zhabei District[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2013, 30(6): 454-456.

闸北区中学生校内意外伤害干预效果评价

Evaluation on Injury Intervention for Middle School Students in Zhabei District

  • 摘要: 目的 对闸北区中学生发生校内意外伤害预防措施的实施效果进行评价, 为制定伤害干预措施提供参考。

    方法 采用整群抽样方法, 随机选取闸北区2 所中学学生, 随机分为干预组和对照组。干预组给予1 年的一系列集体干预措施, 对照组不给予任何干预措施。分析比较干预前后两组学生的伤害知、信、行改变情况和伤害发生情况。

    结果 干预前干预组与对照组学生校内伤害知识平均得分分别为8.18 和8.05, 差异没有统计学意义; 干预后干预组与对照组学生校内伤害知识平均得分分别为9.21 和7.82, 差异有统计学意义。干预前、后两组间伤害预防态度、相关不良行为差异均无统计学意义; 干预后两组校内伤害发生率差异也无统计学意义。

    结论 综合干预能够显著提高学生伤害及其预防相关知识水平。若能持续开展类似干预活动, 从长远看, 对改善伤害相关不良行为和预防中学生校内意外伤害发生, 降低校内伤害发生率有重要意义。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effects of the preventive measures for accidental injuries in middle school students, and to provide reference for formulating injury intervention measures.

    Methods Students of 2 middle schools in Zhabei District were selected by cluster random sampling and randomly divided into an intervention group and a control group. The intervention group implemented a series of collective interventions for 1 year, while the control group without any interventions. Changes in the students' injury-related knowledge, attitude & behavior and the incidence of school injuries were compared and analyzed before and after the intervention.

    Results At the baseline, the average score of injury knowledge was 8.18 for the intervention group and 8.05 for the control group, without statistical differences. After the intervention, the average score of injury knowledge was 9.21 for the intervention group and 7.82 for the control group, and the difference was statistically significant. There was no statistical difference in the injury-related attitude, the practice of unsafe behaviors, and the incidences of school injuries between the intervention group and the control group after the intervention.

    Conclusion The comprehensive intervention has significantly improved students' knowledge level on school injuries and prevention. The injury intervention should be carried out on a long term basis to improve injury related behaviors and reduce the incidence of school injuries.

     

/

返回文章
返回