宿雅, 金克峙, PinnaduwageVijitha DE SILVA, TrulsØSTBYE. 中国外派与斯里兰卡当地建筑工作者职业工效学暴露模式和健康状况的比较[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2021, 38(2): 105-112. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2021.20407
引用本文: 宿雅, 金克峙, PinnaduwageVijitha DE SILVA, TrulsØSTBYE. 中国外派与斯里兰卡当地建筑工作者职业工效学暴露模式和健康状况的比较[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2021, 38(2): 105-112. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2021.20407
SU Ya, JIN Kezhi, Pinnaduwage Vijitha DE SILVA, Truls ØSTBYE. Comparisons of occupational ergonomic exposure patterns and health status of Chinese expatriate and local constructon workers in Sri Lanka[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2021, 38(2): 105-112. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2021.20407
Citation: SU Ya, JIN Kezhi, Pinnaduwage Vijitha DE SILVA, Truls ØSTBYE. Comparisons of occupational ergonomic exposure patterns and health status of Chinese expatriate and local constructon workers in Sri Lanka[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2021, 38(2): 105-112. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2021.20407

中国外派与斯里兰卡当地建筑工作者职业工效学暴露模式和健康状况的比较

Comparisons of occupational ergonomic exposure patterns and health status of Chinese expatriate and local constructon workers in Sri Lanka

  • 摘要: 背景

    近年来中国外派建筑工作者数量已至相当规模,然而目前对这一特殊群体的职业工效学暴露特征、生存质量得分和肌肉骨骼疾患的患病情况了解都严重不足。

    目的

    本研究拟识别不同工种的中国外派和斯里兰卡当地建筑工作者职业工效学因素暴露模式,并探讨国家和工种与主要健康结局(生存质量和肌肉骨骼疾患)之间的关系。

    方法

    采用横断面调查,分别使用中文版和僧伽罗语版世界卫生组织生存质量测定简表和肌肉骨骼疾患调查表,于2018年10-12月分别对中国驻斯里兰卡某建筑工地和当地一个建筑工地的各300名工作者进行问卷调查。采用t检验、卡方检验、线性回归和logistic回归等方法识别不同国家和工种在健康结局的差异。

    结果

    共回收有效问卷581份(中国281份、斯里兰卡300份)。职业工效学暴露模式表现为:中国外派管理后勤人员主要暴露于久坐(59.6%)、颈部(50.6%)和手腕(78.7%)的不良姿势,而一线工人在不良姿势(44.8%~58.9%)、负重(58.3%~75.0%)、重复性操作(54.7%)等不良工效学因素均有较高比例;中国外派与当地一线工人负重>5kg(75.0%,81.9%)、手/臂取物(80.1%,87.5%)、长时间站位工作(78.1%,92.0%)的暴露比例较高,但前者出现稍微弯腰转身(58.9%)和操作空间不足(34.4%)的问题更突出,后者则更多地暴露于手腕不良姿势(64.6%)、负重(67.7%~81.9%)、重复性操作(69.1%)等。健康结局的比较结果显示:中国外派建筑工作者在生理(56.2±12.2 vs.72.9±8.6,中国vs.斯里兰卡,下同)、心理(55.5±14.5 vs.75.9±6.4)、社会关系(61.7±17.2 vs.70.0±8.7)和环境(51.2±16.9 vs.67.2±6.9)领域的生存质量得分低于当地工作者。中国外派管理后勤人员过去一年内肌肉骨骼疾患的患病率达50.6%,高于中斯两国一线工人的28.1%和34.0%(P<0.001)。交互作用分析显示国家与不良姿势在社会关系、环境领域得分,工种与不良姿势在MSDs患病均存在交互作用(P<0.05)。

    结论

    不同国家和工种的职业工效学暴露模式存在一定差异,管理后勤人员主要暴露于久坐和上半身不良姿势,一线工人在多种不良工效学因素的暴露比例均较高,其中中国工人报告弯腰转身和操作空间不足的比例更高,而斯里兰卡工人则更多报告手腕不良姿势、负重、重复性操作等。外派建筑工作者生存质量得分远低于当地工作者,中国管理后勤人员肌肉骨骼疾患患病率远高于其他各组。

     

    Abstract: Background

    In recent years, the number of Chinese expatriate construction workers has reached a considerable scale, but now little is known about the characteristics of occupational ergonomics exposure, the scores of qualities of life, and the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders for this special group.

    Objective

    This study aims to identify occupational ergonomic exposure patterns of Chinese expatriate and Sri Lankan local construction workers with different types of work, and to investigate the relationships of country of origin and type of work with major health outcomes (quality of life and musculoskeletal disorders).

    Methods

    A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 300 workers respectively at a Chinese construction site and 300 workers at a local construction site in Sri Lanka from October to December 2018, using Chinese version and Sinhala version of World Health Organization's Quality of Life Brief (WHOQOL-BREF) and Musculoskeletal Disorders Questionnaire respectively. t test, chi-square test, linear regression, and logistic regression were used to identify differences in health outcomes among different countries and jobs.

    Results

    A total of 581 valid questionnaires were collected, including 281 questionnaires from Chinese workers and 300 questionnaires from Sri Lankan workers. The occupational ergonomic exposure patterns for Chinese expatiates: the management and logistics workers were mainly exposed to sedentary working postures (59.6%), or awkward neck (50.6%) and wrist (78.7%) postures, while the front-line workers had high proportions of awkward postures (44.8%-58.9%), heavy load (58.3%-75.0%), repetitive operation (54.7%), and other adverse ergonomic factors. The exposure proportions of heavy load > 5 kg (75.0%, 81.9%), reaching with arms or hands (80.1%, 87.5%), and standing for a long period (78.1%, 92.0%) were highest in both groups, but the Chinese expatiates had higher proportions of slight bending and twisting (58.9%) and insufficient operating space (34.4%), while the local construction workers had higher proportions of awkward wrist posture (64.6%), heavy load (67.7%-81.9%), and repetitive operation (69.1%). The scores of quality of life among Chinese expatriate construction workers were significantly lower than those of local workers in physical (56.2±12.2 vs. 72.9±8.6, China vs. Sri Lanka, thereafter), psychological (55.5±14.5 vs. 75.9±6.4), social relationship (61.7±17.2 vs. 70.0±8.7), and environmental (51.2±16.9 vs. 67.2±6.9) domains. The prevalence rate of musculoskeletal disorders in the past year among Chinese expatriate management and logistics workers reached 50.6%, higher than that of 28.1% and 34.0% among Chinese and Sri Lankan front-line workers (P<0.001). The interaction analysis results revealed an interaction between country of origin and awkward posture in social and environmental domains, and an interaction between types of job and awkward posture in musculoskeletal disorders (P<0.05).

    Conclusion

    Occupational ergonomic exposure patterns vary in different countries and jobs. Management and logistics workers are largely exposed to sedentary behaviors and upper body awkward postures; front-line workers have higher exposure proportions to a variety of adverse ergonomic factors, of which Chinese workers report higher proportions of bending and twisting and insufficient operating space, while Sri Lankan workers show more awkward wrist posture, heavy load, and repetitive operation. The scores of quality of life among Chinese expatiate construction workers are much lower than those of local workers, and the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among Chinese management and logistics workers is much higher than that of other groups.

     

/

返回文章
返回