杨颖华, 张琳, 张霞, 高剑晖, 侯雪波, 王凯, 苏瑾. 某市轨道交通列车车厢CO2浓度调查及政策建议[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2020, 37(8): 792-796. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2020.19764
引用本文: 杨颖华, 张琳, 张霞, 高剑晖, 侯雪波, 王凯, 苏瑾. 某市轨道交通列车车厢CO2浓度调查及政策建议[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2020, 37(8): 792-796. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2020.19764
YANG Ying-hua, ZHANG Lin, ZHANG Xia, GAO Jian-hui, HOU Xue-bo, WANG Kai, SU Jin. Investigation on carbon dioxide levels in metro carriages in a city and relevant policy suggestions[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2020, 37(8): 792-796. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2020.19764
Citation: YANG Ying-hua, ZHANG Lin, ZHANG Xia, GAO Jian-hui, HOU Xue-bo, WANG Kai, SU Jin. Investigation on carbon dioxide levels in metro carriages in a city and relevant policy suggestions[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2020, 37(8): 792-796. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2020.19764

某市轨道交通列车车厢CO2浓度调查及政策建议

Investigation on carbon dioxide levels in metro carriages in a city and relevant policy suggestions

  • 摘要: 背景

    CO2是轨道交通列车车厢气态污染物的主要成分,车厢环境CO2浓度较高不仅影响乘车舒适性,而且易造成乘客疲倦、头晕,甚至呼吸困难。尤其随着轨道交通运营里程不断增加,乘客在列车车厢内停留时间不断延长,车厢内CO2水平更加值得关注。

    目的

    了解某市轨道交通列车车厢CO2浓度现状,从而提出管控措施建议。

    方法

    于2017年9—11月,选择某市日客流量达50万人次以上的7条轨道交通线路(命名为A~G线)开展列车车厢CO2浓度监测,每条线路监测时段包括工作日高峰期(7:00—9:30或17:00—19:00)和工作日平峰期(9:30—17:00)。每次监测时间为列车从起点至终点的实际单程运行时间,于列车行驶进站、开启车门前读取各个监测点的CO2浓度指示值,计算瞬时浓度和1 h均值浓度。与GB 37488—2019《公共场所卫生指标及限值要求》CO2瞬时浓度(≤ 0.15%)及中国香港《管理空调公共运输设施内空气质素专业守则——铁路》(简称为《专业守则》)CO2 1h均值浓度(卓越级,≤ 0.25%)等限值进行比较,分析原因并提出政策建议。

    结果

    监测的7条线路列车车厢CO2瞬时浓度中位数为0.132%,范围为0.059%~0.295%;1 h均值浓度中位数为0.152%,范围为0.088%~0.204%。符合GB 37488—2019要求的车厢CO2瞬时浓度监测值样品数占所有样品数的比例为63.50%,且所有1 h均值浓度监测值均达到《专业守则》卓越级的要求。除A、B线路高峰期CO2瞬时浓度和C线路高峰期1 h均值浓度外,各线路高峰期车厢CO2瞬时浓度和1 h均值浓度中位数均大于0.15%;除F线路车厢CO2的1 h均值浓度外,高峰期各线路车厢CO2瞬时浓度和1 h均值浓度均高于平峰期(P < 0.05)。高峰期车厢CO2瞬时浓度符合GB 37488—2019的样品数占比达44.0%,平峰期车厢CO2瞬时浓度符合该要求的样品数占比达93.0%;高峰期和平峰期CO2 1 h均值浓度均达到《专业守则》卓越级的要求。地下运行组车厢CO2瞬时浓度中位数(0.135%)高于地上运行组(0.117%)(P < 0.05)。

    结论

    该市目前轨道交通列车车厢CO2浓度不完全满足GB 37488—2019《公共场所卫生指标及限值要求》中对CO2浓度限值的要求,均可达到《专业守则》卓越级要求。客流量和列车运行环境均影响该市轨道交通列车车厢CO2水平,建议采取高峰期客流限制,调整列车车厢和隧道环境通风能力,增设在线监测及联动控制装置等CO2浓度管控措施。

     

    Abstract: Background

    Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a main component of gaseous pollutants in metro carriages. The high concentration of CO2 in carriages not only affects comfortability, but also easily tends to cause fatigue, dizziness, and even breathing difficulties for passengers. With the continuous increase of metro operating mileage and the continuous extension of time passengers spend in carriages, the concentration of CO2 in carriages deserves attention.

    Objective

    This study investigates the concentration of CO2 in metro carriages in a city and put forward corresponding control measures.

    Methods

    From September to November 2017, the concentration of CO2 were monitored in carriages of seven metro lines (A-G) with a daily passenger flow of more than 500 000 in the selected city in rush hours (7:00-9:30 or 17:00-19:00) and non-rush hours (9:30-17:00) of working days. Each monitoring sample set covered an actual continuous one-way end-to-end running time of a sampled train. Each CO2 concentration at monitoring sites was recorded before carriage door open after arriving at a stop. The instantaneous concentration and hourly average concentration of CO2 were calculated and compared with the national standard Hygienic indicators and limits for public places (GB 37488-2019) (CO2 instantaneous concentration, ≤ 0.15%) and Hong Kong's Practice Note for Managing Air Quality in Air-conditioned Public Transport Facilities-Railways (Practice Note, thereafter; CO2 hourly average concentration level 1, ≤ 0.25%), and then the sources of differences were analyzed and relevant policy suggestions were proposed.

    Results

    The median of CO2 instantaneous concentration in carriages of selected seven metro lines was 0.132%, and the range was 0.059%-0.295%; the median of CO2 hourly average concentration was 0.152%, and the range was 0.088%-0.204%. More than half (63.50%) of the samples met the requirements for CO2 instantaneous concentration stipulated by GB 37488-2019, and all samples met the requirement for CO2 hourly average concentration level 1 specified by Practice Note. Except the instantaneous concentrations of CO2 in rush hours of line A and line B and the hourly average concentration of CO2 in rush hours of line C, the medians of instantaneous concentration and hourly average concentration of CO2 in rush hours of each line were greater than 0.15%. Except the CO2 hourly average concentration of line F, the CO2 instantaneous concentration and hourly average concentration in rush hours of each line were higher than those in non-rush hours (P < 0.05). In rush hours, 44.0% of the samples met the requirements for CO2 instantaneous concentration by GB 37488-2019; in non-rush hours, 93.0% of the samples met the requirements. In rush and non-rush hours, all samples met the requirements for CO2 hourly average concentration level 1 by Practice Note. The median of CO2 instantaneous concentration in carriages running underground (0.135%) was higher than that in carriages running on the ground (0.117%) (P < 0.05).

    Conclusion

    At present, the concentration of CO2 in carriages in the selected city does not fully meet the requirements of GB 37488-2019, but fully meet the requirements of Practice Note level 1. Both passenger flow and metro running environment affect the concentrations of CO2 in carriages; therefore, it is suggested to take such CO2 concentration control measures as peak passenger flow restriction, adjustment of ventilation capacity of carriages and tunnels, and installation of online monitoring and linkage control devices.

     

/

返回文章
返回