吴宁, 戴俊明, 陈张, 李赞, 钱进华, 高俊岭, 王忠泽, 傅华. 江苏省东台市居民生活环境与主观幸福感的关联[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2018, 35(8): 729-734. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2018.18104
引用本文: 吴宁, 戴俊明, 陈张, 李赞, 钱进华, 高俊岭, 王忠泽, 傅华. 江苏省东台市居民生活环境与主观幸福感的关联[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2018, 35(8): 729-734. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2018.18104
WU Ning, DAI Jun-ming, CHEN Zhang, LI Zan, QIAN Jin-hua, GAO Jun-ling, WANG Zhongze, FU Hua. Relationship between living environment and subjective well-being of residents in Dongtai City, Jiangsu Province[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2018, 35(8): 729-734. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2018.18104
Citation: WU Ning, DAI Jun-ming, CHEN Zhang, LI Zan, QIAN Jin-hua, GAO Jun-ling, WANG Zhongze, FU Hua. Relationship between living environment and subjective well-being of residents in Dongtai City, Jiangsu Province[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2018, 35(8): 729-734. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2018.18104

江苏省东台市居民生活环境与主观幸福感的关联

Relationship between living environment and subjective well-being of residents in Dongtai City, Jiangsu Province

  • 摘要: 目的 了解江苏省东台市居民的主观幸福感现状,探究生活环境与幸福感间的关联,为制定合适可行的居民主观幸福感促进方案提供依据。

    方法 2017年8—9月,运用配额抽样方法选择东台市14个乡镇的3 665位常住居民进行问卷调查,所有调查对象知情同意并匿名、自主完成问卷填写,选用个人幸福指数量表评估主观幸福感,生活环境评估量表包括美观程度、健身环境、服务与治安、环境质量4个子量表。运用单因素方差分析检验幸福感在不同个体特征间的差异;多因素回归模型分析生活环境与幸福感的关联。

    结果 问卷有效率为79.3%。调查对象主观幸福感总分为(7.38±1.76)分,并在不同年龄、受教育程度、婚姻和经济状况的居民间存在统计学差异(均P < 0.05)。多因素分析显示:在调整人口学特征后,以低水平组为对照,美观程度中、高水平组的OR分别为1.52(95% CI:1.23~1.89)和2.97(95% CI:2.25~3.92);健身环境中、高水平组的OR分别为1.11(95% CI:0.89~1.37)和1.64(95% CI:1.27~2.11);服务与治安中、高水平组的OR分别为1.08(95% CI:0.87~1.33)和1.81(95% CI:1.40~2.34);环境质量中、高水平组的OR分别为1.57(95% CI:1.27~1.94)和2.77(95% CI:2.12~3.61)。

    结论 生活环境会影响居民主观幸福感水平,优良的生活环境可能是居民主观幸福感的保护因素。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the current status of subjective well-being among residents in Dongtai City of Jiangsu Province, assess its association with living environment, and provide a basis for formulating a feasible residents' subjective well-being promotion program.

    Methods From August to September 2017, a total of 3 665 residents from 14 towns in Dongtai were selected by quota sampling method to complete questionnaires in an anonymous way with informed consent. Subjective well-being was assessed with Personal Well-being Index, and living environment was assessed in four dimensions:neighborhood aesthetics, fitness environment, public service and safety, and quality of environment. One-way ANOVA was applied to test the difference in subjective well-being among residents grouped by demographic characteristics, and multi-factor analysis was used to assess the relationship between living environment and subjective well-being.

    Results The valid response rate was 79.3%. The total score of subjective well-being of residents was 7.38±1.76, and the differences were significant among subjects with different ages, education levels, marital status, and economic status (Ps < 0.05).After being adjusted for demographic characteristics, the results of multi-factor analysis on subject well-being showed that compared with those with low level, the OR (95%CI) of residents with medium and high levels of aesthetics were 1.52 (1.23-1.89) and 2.97 (2.25-3.92) respectively; the OR (95%CI) of residents with medium and high levels of fitness environment were 1.11 (0.89-1.37) and 1.64 (1.27-2.11) respectively; the OR (95%CI) of residents with medium and high levels of public service and safety were 1.08 (0.87-1.33) and 1.81 (1.40-2.34) respectively; the OR (95%CI) of residents with medium and high levels of environmental quality were 1.57 (1.27-1.94) and 2.77 (2.12-3.61) respectively.

    Conclusion Living environment affects residents' subjective well-being, and good living environment could be a protective factor.

     

/

返回文章
返回