工作压力和工作重塑与高校辅导员职业倦怠的关系

Relationship between job stress, job crafting, and job burnout among college counselors

  • 摘要:
    背景 职业倦怠已成为影响高校辅导员身心健康和工作效率的重要因素,并间接影响着大学生的人才培养质量和发展。
    目的 探讨高校辅导员的工作压力、工作重塑和职业倦怠之间的关系,检验工作重塑在工作压力和职业倦怠之间的中介作用,以期采取针对性措施缓解辅导员的工作压力和职业倦怠,减少对辅导员群体的健康危害和提高育人实效。
    方法 通过方便抽样法,在高校辅导员社交网络交流群招募400名辅导员进行匿名问卷调查,采用《辅导员工作压力量表》《工作重塑量表》和《职业倦怠通用版量表》对研究对象的工作压力、工作重塑和职业倦怠进行评价。采用Harman单因素法检验调查数据是否存在共同方法偏差;运用单因素方差分析检验辅导员工作压力、工作重塑和职业倦怠在不同个体特征的差异,卡方检验分析职业倦怠检出率的差异;采用偏相关分析各变量间的相关性;采用结构方程模型分析辅导员工作压力、工作重塑及职业倦怠三者之间的关系,同时使用Bootstrap法检验工作重塑在工作压力和职业倦怠之间的中介作用,并分析各变量之间的关系。
    结果 回收问卷390份,有效问卷338份,有效回收率86.67%。研究对象全体的工作压力、工作重塑和职业倦怠得分分别为(2.70±0.62)、(3.77±0.62)、(2.09±1.09)分。职业倦怠检出率为76.9%(260/338),其中耗竭维度倦怠检出率为72.8%,愤世嫉俗维度倦怠检出率为59.8%。不同性别和职级的辅导员在工作重塑得分上具有统计学差异(P<0.05),女辅导员的职业倦怠得分和检出率显著高于男辅导员(P<0.05)。偏相关分析表明,工作压力、工作负荷、学校考评与期待、人际关系与职业倦怠呈正向相关(r=0.562、0.442、0.473、0.455,P<0.01),与工作重塑呈负向相关(r=−0.271、−0.169、−0.246、−0.247,P<0.01);工作重塑、认知重塑、关系重塑、任务重塑与职业倦怠呈负向相关(r=−0.447、−0.452、−0.366、−0.340,P<0.01)。修正后的结构方程模型显示:工作压力对工作重塑具有负向影响作用(b=−0.348,P<0.001),工作压力对职业倦怠有正向影响作用(b=0.454,P<0.001),工作重塑对职业倦怠有负向影响作用(b=−0.459,P<0.001),工作重塑能够部分中介工作压力对辅导员职业倦怠的影响,中介效应值为0.160(95%CI:0.102~0.230),占总效应值26.10%。
    结论 辅导员的职业倦怠问题比较突出,工作重塑对职业倦怠有抑制作用,工作压力通过抑制工作重塑的产生间接影响职业倦怠的发生。

     

    Abstract:
    Background Job burnout has become an important factor affecting the mental and physical health and work efficiency of college counselors, and indirectly affects the quality and development of talent cultivation for college students.
    Objective To explore the relationship between job stress, job crafting, and job burnout among college counselors, and to test the mediating role of job crafting between job stress and job burnout, in order to take targeted measures to alleviate job stress and job burnout of college counselors, reduce associated health risks, and improve the effectiveness of higher education.
    Methods An anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted among 400 counselors from social network communication groups by convenience sampling. The Counselor Work Stress Scale, Job Crafting Scale, and Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey were used. Harman's single-factor method was used to evaluate common method bias in the survey data. One-way ANOVA was applied to test the difference in job stress, job crafting, and job burnout among college counselors by demographic characteristics, and chi-square test was used to analyze the difference in reporting job burnout. Partial correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between selected variables. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the relationship of job stress, job crafting, and job burnout among college counselors, and Bootstrap analysis was used to test if there was a mediating effect of job crafting on the relationship between job stress and job burnout.
    Results Of the 390 questionnaires recovered, there were 338 valid questionnaires (86.67%). Among the included subjects, the mean scores of job stress, job crafting, and job burnout were (2.70±0.62), (3.77±0.62), and (2.09±1.09), respectively. The positive rate of job burnout was 76.9% (260/338), with a positive rate of 72.8% in exhaustion dimension and 59.8% in cynicism dimension. There were significant differences in job crafting scores among the college counselors by different genders and professional titles (P<0.05). Female counselors had significantly higher job burnout scores and positive rates than male counselors (P<0.05). The partial correlation analysis showed that job stress, work load, school evaluation and expectation, and interpersonal relationship were positively correlated with job burnout (r=0.562, 0.442, 0.473, and 0.455, respectively, P<0.01), and negatively correlated with job crafting (r=−0.271, −0.169, −0.246, and −0.247, respectively, P<0.01); job crafting, cognitive crafting, relationship crafting, and task crafting were negatively correlated with job burnout (r=−0.447, −0.452, −0.366, and −0.340, respectively, P<0.01). The modified structural equation modeling indicated that job stress negatively affected job crafting (b=−0.348, P<0.001) and positively affected job burnout (b=0.454, P<0.001); job crafting negatively affected job burnout (b=−0.459, P<0.001), and played a partial mediating role in the relationship between job stress and job burnout, and the effect value was 0.160 (95%CI: 0.102, 0.230) that accounted for 26.10% of the total effect.
    Conclusion Job burnout among the college counselors is prominent. Job crafting presents an inhibitory effect on job burnout. Job stress indirectly affects the occurrence of job burnout by inhibiting the generation of job crafting.

     

/

返回文章
返回