上海122种市售现制奶茶中的营养成分

Nutrient content of 122 kinds of retail handcrafted milk tea products in Shanghai

  • 摘要:
    背景 市售现制奶茶行业处于快速发展期,其营养素含量研究甚少,制约了奶茶营养指导工作的开展。
    目的 测定上海市销量排名靠前的市售现制奶茶的营养素含量,分析奶茶的营养特点。
    方法 2018年和2021年,在“美团”和“饿了么”订餐平台上搜索“奶茶”,共选取在上海市有≥3家分店的现制奶茶品牌共13个,采集其销量排名靠前的3类现制奶茶奶茶(包含其销售的所有甜度等级)、奶盖茶、水果茶共122种。采用国标方法检测能量、蛋白质、脂肪、碳水化合物、糖、反式脂肪酸、钙、咖啡因、茶多酚。
    结果 市售现制奶茶能量中位数为310 kJ(每100 g样本计)。能量主要来源于碳水化合物和脂肪。奶盖茶、奶茶的能量、蛋白质、脂肪含量高于水果茶(P<0.05),三者的碳水化合物含量差异无统计学意义。奶茶的总糖及果糖、葡萄糖含量低于奶盖茶和果茶(P<0.05);水果茶的乳糖含量低于奶茶和奶盖茶(P<0.05)。奶盖茶的反式脂肪酸含量高于奶茶(P<0.05)。咖啡因和茶多酚的含量中位数均表现为奶茶>奶盖茶(P<0.05)。奶茶能量、碳水化合物、蔗糖、总糖、钙含量与加料数量(0~3种)呈正相关(r=0.386、0.371、0.238、0.698、0.466,P<0.05)。能量、碳水化合物、总糖的含量随着甜度升高均呈上升趋势(P<0.05),且总糖主要是蔗糖,其次为果糖和葡萄糖。标称不额外加糖的样品总糖含量是3.40(2.20,4.9)g,其中93.3%总糖含量大于0.5 g;标称三分糖的样品总糖含量是4.97(4.25,5.97)g,其中47.4%总糖含量大于5 g;标称五分糖的样品总糖含量是5.80(4.31,6.88)g;标称七分糖的样品总糖含量是6.59(5.17,8.53)g;标称全糖的样品总糖含量是7.96(6.82,9.20)g,94.0%的样本总糖含量大于5 g,大于10 g的比例是18.0%(标称不同含糖量的样本糖含量值均为每100 g样本计)。
    结论 市售现制奶茶营养素不均衡,具有能量高、添加糖含量高、脂肪含量高、蛋白质含量低的特点。需要规范糖添加量和甜度标注,加强奶茶营养宣传教育,引导居民适当限制其摄入量。

     

    Abstract:
    Background The retail milk tea industry is in a period of rapid development, but there is little research on its nutrient content, which restricts the nutritional guidance of milk tea.
    Objective To determine the levels of nutrients in best-selling handcrafted milk tea in Shanghai and analyze the nutritional characteristics.
    Methods In 2018 and 2021, a total of 13 handcrafted milk tea brands with ≥3 branch stores in Shanghai were selected by searching for milk tea on Meituan and Ele.me food delivery platforms, and a total of 122 types of handcrafted milk tea products were collected from the top three sales milk tea (including all sweetness levels available), milk cover tea, and fruit tea. National standard methods were used to detect energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, sugar, trans fatty acid, calcium, caffeine, and tea polyphenol.
    Results The median energy of the milk tea samples was 310 kJ (per 100 g sample). The main sources of energy were carbohydrate and fat. The levels of energy, protein, and fat in milk cover tea and milk tea were significantly higher than those in fruit tea (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in carbohydrate among them. The total sugar, fructose, and glucose levels in milk tea were significantly lower than those in milk cover tea and fruit tea, and the lactose level in fruit tea was significantly lower than those in milk tea and milk cover tea (P<0.05). Themedian trans fat acid level in milk cover tea was higher than that in milk tea (P<0.05). The median levels of caffeine and tea polyphenol were higher in milk tea than in milk cover tea (P<0.05). The levels of energy, carbohydrate, sucrose, total sugar, and calcium in milk tea were positively correlated with the number of ingredients added (0-3) (r=0.386, 0.371, 0.238, 0.698, 0.466, respectively, P < 0.05). The levels of energy, carbohydrate, and total sugar tended to increase with increasing sweetness (P<0.05), and total sugar was mainly sucrose, followed by fructose and glucose. The total sugar levels of the samples labeled sugar free, light sugar, half sugar, less sugar, and regular sugar were 3.40 (2.20, 4.9), 4.97 (4.25, 5.97), 5.80 (4.31, 6.88), 6.59 (5.17, 8.53), and 7.96 (6.82, 9.20) g, respectively; the proportions of the samples containing more than 0.5 g of total sugar were 93.3% for sugar free milk tea, 47.4% for light sugar milk tea, and 94.0% for regular sugar milk tea; the proportion of the regular sugar samples with sugar content greater than 10 g was 18.0% (all samples with nominal sugar content were measured per 100 g).
    Conclusion The retail handcrafted milk tea in Shanghai is characterized by high energy, high added sugar, high fat, and low protein. It is necessary to standardize the added sugar content and sweetness labeling, strengthen the nutrition education of milk tea, and guide residents to limit its intake.

     

/

返回文章
返回